Table 1.

Trial characteristics

StudyCountryPopulationNInterventionComparatorOutcomesResult
Armstrong 200322Queensland, AustraliaDepressed population20Group exercise programme (pram walks) with social co-intervention 12 weeksPhone support at 6 weeks post-randomisationEPDS and DASS 6 and 12 weeksIntervention group depression improved significantly compared with control
Daley 200828Birmingham, UKSedentary population
Depressed population
38Exercise counselling 12 weeksUsual care
Exercise consultion of trial
EPDS 24 weeksNo significant difference in EPDS between groups
Robichaud 200825Tennessee, USDepressed population48Exercise programme (home-based walking) 6 weeksUsual activity
Intervention after trial
EPDS 8 weeksNo significant difference in EPDS between groups
Da Costa 200923Montreal, CanadaSedentary population
Depressed population
88Exercise counselling 12 weeksUsual careEPDS and 17-item
HAM-D 3 and 6 months
No significant change in EPDS from baseline to follow-up
Norman 201026Melbourne, AustraliaGeneral postpartum population161Group exercise programme with co-intervention (weekly educational session on postpartum issues) 8 weeksEducation on topics unrelated to diet or physical activity
Booklet of exercises, list of gyms and community facilities
EPDS 8 and 12 weeksSignificant decrease in EPDS in intervention compared with comparator
Huang 201124Northern TaiwanDepressed population160Exercise counselling with dietary co-intervention
Postpartum group: 6 months
‘Standard care’ discussions with nurses and leaflets on unrelated topicsBDI 6 monthsSignificant increase in BDI in intervention and comparator groups
Surkan 201227Northeast USGeneral postpartum population679Exercise counselling with dietary co-intervention 12 monthsUsual WIC care: nutrition assessment, education, food vouchersCES-D
Mean follow-up 13.3 months (SD 3.7)
Modest decrease in CES-D in intervention compared with control. Difference was significant in fully adjusted analysis
Haruna 201332Tokyo, JapanGeneral postpartum population110Group exercise programme 4 weeksNo details provided
Intervention at end of trial
EPDS 2 and 4 monthsNo significant difference in EPDS between groups
Thiruppathi 201430Nellore, IndiaGeneral postpartum population45Group exercise programme 4 weeksHealthcare education programme. Written materials on nutrition, baby care, postureEPDS 12 weeksSignificant decrease in intervention group from baseline to follow-up. No significant change in comparator group
Keller 201431A southwestern city, USGeneral postpartum population139Exercise counselling with group exercise (walking) and a co-intervention of ‘promotoras’ (peer support) 12 weeksAttention control. Monthly newsletters and weekly phone calls on unrelated topicsEPDS 6 and 12 monthsNo significant difference between groups
Lewis 201429Minnesota, USGeneral postpartum population130Exercise counselling 6 monthsCounsellor delivered telephone sessions on stress management, sleep, nutritionSCID-1 at 6 months only
PHQ-9
EPDS at 6 months only
Significant decrease in PHQ-9 and EPDS in intervention compared with control
Boath 201534Stoke-on-Trent, UKDepressed population22Group exercise programme (pram walk or facility based) 12 weeksOne discussion about their goals for managing postpartum depressionEPDS 3 and 6 monthsNo significant difference in EPDS between groups
Daley 201533Birmingham, UKDepressed population94Exercise counselling 6 monthsUsual care Leaflet on healthy postpartum lifestyleEPDS 6 and 12 monthsDecrease in EPDS in intervention versus comparator, only significant at 6 months not at 12 months
  • BDI =The Beck Depression Inventory. CES-D = The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. DASS = The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. EPDS = The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. HAM-D = The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. PHQ-9 = The Patient Health Questionnaire-9. SCID = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM. SD = standard deviation. WIC = Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.