Table 2.

Modelling of overall failure to complete actions

Univariate modelsMultivariate model
OR95% CIP-valueOR95% CIP-value
Practice (10 is reference)0.444a
Practice 111.100.34 to 3.600.875
Practice 121.10.34 to3.600.875
Practice 131.030.32 to 3.350.959
Practice 141.360.40 to 4.700.624
Practice 153.641.04 to 12.780.044
Practice 161.500.46 to 4.880.501
Practice 171.180.36 to 3.890.787
Practice 181.270.38 to 4.220.698
Practice 190.750.23 to 2.490.639
Admission length1.000.99 to 1.010.939
Days to GP workflow0.030.03 to 1.140.253
Receipt time estimate1.010.99 to 1.020.503
Speciality surgical1.230.58 to 2.590.587
Ratio of GPs to patient population1.001.00 to 1.000.0981.001.00 to 1.000.693
Practice size (small is reference)0.022a0.417a
Medium practice size0.330.13 to 0.850.0220.400.10 to 1.610.195
Large practice size0.270.10 to 0.720.0090.350.07 to 1.760.203
EMIS Web IT system1.110.67 to 1.850.685
Training practice status0.990.52 to 1.890.985
IMD of practice1.010.99 to 1.030.490
Urban practice1.160.51 to 2.630.728
QOF score of practice0.950.88 to 1.030.192
CQC ratingb1.620.99 to 2.650.0530.980.45 to 2.120.962
Patient age1.030.98 to 1.070.257
Patient sex, male1.400.84 to 2.330.191
Number of medicines changes1.121.01 to 1.250.0281.141.02 to 1.270.0216
Hospital (Nottingham QMC is reference)0.100a0.631a
Central Manchester Hospital0.670.33 to 1.400.2880.680.31 to 1.510.345
University of Coventry Hospital1.890.97 to 3.650.0601.220.49 to 3.050.664
Other hospitals1.300.49 to 3.480.6011.300.47 to 3.580.616
Follow-up on phone0.950.57 to 1.600.854
  • a ANOVA P-values are from a likelihood ratio test, the remainder are Wald P-values.

  • b CQC rating was converted to a numeric scale for all analyses (1 = outstanding, 2 = good, 3 = requires improvement) in order to model this variable. ANOVA = analysis of variance. CQC = Care Quality Commission. EMIS = Egton Medical Information Systems. IMD = index of multiple deprivation. OR = odds ratio. QMC = Queen’s Medical Centre. QOF = Quality and Outcomes Framework.