Table 1.

Study characteristics.

StudyCountryHealthcare professionalsData collection methodQuality rating
Aakhus, et al (2014)35NorwayGPs, nurses (primary and secondary health care), psychiatrists, researchers (n= 26 total)InterviewsNot very good
Apesoa-Varano, et al (2010)28USPrimary care physicians (n= 9), depression care managers (n= 9 nurses, n= 2 psychologists)InterviewsVery good
Bao, et al (2014)30USNurses (n= 9), nurse supervisors (n= 5), clinical/medical directors (n= 6)InterviewsGood
Bao, et al (2015)29USNurses (n= 9), nurse supervisors (n= 5), clinical/medical directors (n= 6)InterviewsNot very good
Burroughs, et al (2006)19UKGPs (n= 9), practice nurses (n= 3), district nurses (n= 2), community nurses (n= 3)InterviewsVery good
Dickinson, et al (2010)31UKGPs (n= 10)InterviewsGood
Gordon (2013)32UKGPs (n= 14)InterviewsVery good
Hassall and Gill (2008)33AustraliaCare staff (n= 17), including directors of nursing, clinical nurse consultants, registered nurses, respite coordinators, and social workersInterviewsGood
Iden, et al (2011)43NorwayFull- and part-time nursing home doctors (n= 16), registered nurses (n= 8)Three focus groupsGood
Liebel and Powers (2015)34USHome healthcare nurses (n= 16)Individual interviews and two focus groupsVery good
Liebel, et al (2015)47USHome healthcare nurses (n= 4)Observation of 25 home visits, with moderate participationVery good
Lin (2005)36USPsychiatric home care nurses (n= 9), team director (n= 1)InterviewsNot very good
Lu and Hsieh (2013)37TaiwanPublic health nurses (n= 12), home care nurses (n= 5), long-term care nurses (n= 2), social workers (n= 5), dietitian (n= 1)InterviewsVery good
McCabe, et al (2009)38AustraliaProfessional care assistants from different aged settings (n= 21), registered nurses (n= 2), trainee nurses (n= 2), GPs (n= 10), senior aged care managers (n= 7)InterviewsNot very good
Murray, et al (2006)18UKGPs (n= 18), practice nurses (n= 7), practice counsellors (n= 5)InterviewsVery good
Patel and Prince (2001)44IndiaPrimary health centre doctors (n= 3), multipurpose health workers (n= 17)Three focus groups, including a vignette on depressionNot very good
Pusey (2009)39UKDistrict nurses (n= 11)Three focus groups, one individual interviewVery good
Saarela and Engeström (2003)45FinlandPrimary care physicians (n= 25), psychiatrists (n= 11)Seven focus groups and individual management plans, using two vignettesNot very good
Stanners, et al (2012)40AustraliaGPs (n= 8)InterviewsVery good
Strachan, et al (2015)41UKGPs (n= 9)Three group interviewsGood
Sussman, et al (2011)49CanadaFamily physicians (n= 3), psychiatrists (n= 2), nurse practitioners (n= 3), social workers (n= 3), decision makers (n= 1)Small group discussions, with nominal group technique ranking of proposed solutionsGood
Tai-Seale, et al (2007)48USPhysicians (n= 35)Observations of 385 videotaped consultations between physicians and older peopleNot very good
Todman, et al (2011)50UKGPs (n= 119)Mixed methods questionnaire survey including an open qualitative questionNot very good
Timson (2013)51UKReferring agents (GPs, n= 4), referred-to psychologists (n= 4), wider members of case groups (n= 13, including older adults, family member, community psychiatric nurse, and, sometimes, a psychiatrist)Multiple case study of four older adults with depression and professionals around themGood
Waterworth, et al (2015)42NZPrimary health care nurses, district nurses, heart failure nurses (n not reported)InterviewsNot very good
White, et al (2017)46AustraliaHCPs from acute settings (n= 7), sub-acute (geriatric assessment and rehabilitation, n= 20) and community care (n= 27), including medical officers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, social workers, neuropsychologists, registered nurses, podiatrists, speech pathologists, and music therapistsEleven focus groupsVery good
Wittink, et al (2011)27USInternists (internal medicine physicians, with focus on adult medicine, n= 9), family doctors (n= 4), geriatric medicine physicians (n= 2)InterviewsVery good
  • HCP = healthcare professional. NZ = New Zealand.