Table 4.

Association of overall patient experience with types of funding per patient

Funding variablesModel 3Model 4Model 5Model 6
Practices, n7137713771377137
Capitation fundinga,b0.02 (−0.12 to 0.17)0.003 (−0.17 to 0.17)0.20c (0.06 to 0.34)0.12 (−0.07 to 0.35)
Performance- related funding a,b0.36d (0.26 to 0.46)0.43d (0.32 to 0.54)0.39d (0.26 to 0.51)0.18e (0.04 to 0.33)
Operational fundinga,b1.10d (0.89 to 1.30)1.08d (0.86 to 1.32)1.63d (1.39 to 1.87)1.10d (0.53 to 1.67)
Practice effectsRandomRandomRandomFixed
Years2013/2014 to 2016/20172014/2015 to 2016/20172014/2015 to 2016/20172014/2015 to 2016/2017
Funding yearCurrentCurrent1 year lag1 year lag
  • a Results show percentage change associated with 1 SD increase in funding (±95% CI).

  • b All models contain year effects, patient characteristics, practice characteristics.

  • c P<0.01.

  • d P<0.001.

  • e P<0.05. All models account for clustering at general practice level. CI = confidence interval. SD = standard deviation.