Outcomes analysis of GP urgent care records (KIS), ACP plan content, and quality
| Intervention feasibility outcomes | All (n= 46) | Intervention (n= 25) | Control (n = 21) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | n (%) | 95% CI | N | n (%) | 95% CI | N | n (%) | 95% CI | |
| Eligible patients who were randomised | 99 | 46 (46) | 36.4 to 56.8 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| New or updated KIS in patient clinical record | 44 | 37 (84) | 69.9 to 93.4 | 24 | 20 (83) | 62.6 to 95.3 | 20 | 17 (85) | 62.1 to 96.8 |
| Clear ACP plan included in patient KIS | 37 | 19 (51) | 34.4 to 68.1 | 20 | 9 (45) | 23.1 to 68.5 | 17 | 10 (59) | 32.9 to 81.6 |
| Letter helped me get a GP appointmenta | N/A | N/A | N/A | 17 | 11 (65) | 38.3 to 85.8 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Clinician assessment of KIS-ACP qualityb | 37 | 20 | 17 | ||||||
| High | 7 (19) | N/A | 2 (10) | N/A | 5 (29) | N/A | |||
| Medium | 12 (32) | N/A | 7 (35) | N/A | 5 (29) | N/A | |||
| Low | 18 (49) | N/A | 11 (55) | N/A | 7 (41) | N/A | |||
↵a Included in denominator if participants had provided any response (yes/no) to the question.
↵b For KIS-ACP quality, post hoc clinical review changed the grading of KIS-ACP assessments (n = 4) after the quantitative analysis report had been issued. ACP = advance (anticipatory) care planning. KIS = key information summary. KIS-ACP = key information summary — advance (anticipatory) care plan. N/A = not applicable.