Table 3.

Multilevel regression analysis to identify predictors of UPC scores (n = 347 728 patients contributing to this model)a

VariableDemographic and practice factors
β coefficient95% CIP-value
Age, years
3–17Reference
18–390.0300.028 to 0.032<0.001
40–640.0550.053 to 0.057<0.001
≥650.0820.080 to 0.084<0.001
Sex
MaleReference
Female0.0260.025 to 0.027<0.001
Ethnicityb
WhiteReference
Black−0.010−0.012 to −0.008<0.001
South Asian−0.016−0.018 to −0.014<0.001
Other−0.004−0.007 to −0.0010.01
Internal IMD 2015 quintile
1 (least deprived)Reference
2−0.005−0.007 to −0.002<0.001
3−0.006−0.008 to −0.004<0.001
4−0.006−0.008 to −0.004<0.001
5 (most deprived)−0.009−0.011 to −0.007<0.001
Practice list size
<5000Reference
≥5000 to <10 000−0.101−0.141 to −0.062<0.001
≥10 000−0.181−0.219 to −0.142<0.001
Locality
City & HackneyReference
Newham0.031−0.005 to 0.0680.09
Tower Hamlets0.008−0.032 to 0.0480.68
  • a Multilevel model comprises patients nested within practices. Intraclass correlation (ICC) showing the proportion of variation in UPC scores at practice level = 0.259.

  • b Ethnicity not stated/missing is not reported. CI = confidence interval. IMD = Index of Multiple Deprivation. UPC = Usual Provider of Care.