Table 1.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Domain	Inclusion criteria	Exclusion criteria
General criteria	Publication date: January 2000–September 2021 Any scholarly (peer-reviewed) empirical study design — for example, randomised controlled trials, quantitative surveys, and qualitative interviews Human research	Publication date: pre-2000 Non-empirical articles — for example, commentaries and opinion articles
Population	Involve a GP/family doctor and a population described as ‘priority’ — for example, indigenous, low-income, and culturally and linguistically diverse	No clear description of clinician involved Generalist physician practising in a hospital setting Involving health professionals but no GP No clear description of priority patient population
Intervention^a	A tangible, publicly available behaviour change tool or product that is not considered part of usual care	Behaviour change theory (for example, social cognitive theory), rather than a tool Behaviour change approach (for example, counselling) rather than a tool Screening tools without any behaviour change components
Setting	Primary health care General practice Family medicine Aboriginal medical services	Acute care Hospitals
Target behaviour	Health-related behaviours (for example, diet, smoking, and physical activity) and/or family doctor practices	Healthcare screening behaviours (for example, cancer screening) Utilisation of healthcare services Not informing a change in behaviour
Outcomes	Must evaluate effectiveness (such as rates of smoking cessation and patient weight loss) and/or feasibility/acceptability, such as perceived usefulness of the tool, perceived relevance, and impact on practice	No evaluation and clear description of tool effectiveness and/or feasibility/acceptability

↵a Although the review was not restricted to intervention studies, all included studies were required to report on use of a tool by family doctors.