Abstract
Purpose
To review the evaluation and treatment of epididymitis in a contemporary population and evaluate adherence to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines.
Materials and methods
From 1999 to 2005, 870 patients from a single institution were diagnosed with epididymitis. Information regarding patient demographics, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment was reviewed. Adherence to CDC guidelines for the treatment of acute epididymitis was evaluated.
Results
A total of 455 men between 3 and 88 years met inclusion requirements for acute epididymitis. Seven percent of pediatric patients (<18 years) and 29.5% of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing urine culture demonstrated bacterial growth. Twelve percent of adult patients with urethral swab PCR performed for Chlamydia trachomatis had positive results. A bacterial etiology for epididymitis was documented in 6.6% of pediatric patients and 28% of adult patients who were tested by urine culture and/or urethral swab for C. trachomatis. Less than 35% of adult men underwent the appropriate CDC work-up. Fifty percent of patients, 18–35 years and 85% of patients, >35 years were prescribed an effective treatment according to CDC guidelines. Patients were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (100 vs. 2.3%) and more likely to be treated with antibiotics than in previously published series (97 vs. 75%).
Conclusions
CDC guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of acute epididymitis were followed in less than 35% of patients seen in a university based health care system. Despite a paucity of documented urinary infection, 97% of adult men are treated empirically with antibiotics often not in accordance with CDC guidelines.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collins MM, Stafford RS, O’Leary MP, Barry MJ (1998) How common is prostatitis? A national survey of physician visits. J Urol 159:1224. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63564-X
Moore CA, Lockett BL, Lennox KW, McAminch JW, Wurster JC, Ceccarelli FE et al (1971) Prednisone in the treatment of acute epididymitis: a cooperative study. J Urol 106:578
Mittemeyer BT, Lennox KW, Borski AA (1966) Epididymitis: a review of 610 cases. J Urol 95:390
Hawkins DA, Taylor-Robinson D, Thomas BJ, Harris JR (1986) Microbiological survey of acute epididymitis. Genitourin Med 62:342
Scheibel JH, Anderson JT, Brandenhoff P et al (1983) Chlamydia trachomatis in acute epididymitis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 17:47
Pearson RC, Baumber CD, McGhie D, Thambar IV (1988) The relevance of Chlamydia trachomatis in acute epididymitis in young men. Br J Urol 62:72
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. MMWR 51(No. RR-6). http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/6-2002TG.htm
Berger RE, Alexander ER et al (1979) Etiology, manifestations, and therapy of acute epididymitis: prospective study of 50 cases. J Urol 121:750
Drury NE, Dyer JP, Breitenfeldt N, Adamson AS, Harrison GSM (2004) Management of acute epididymitis: are European Guidelines being followed? Eur Urol 46:522. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.017
Berger RE, Lee JC (2002) Sexually transmitted diseases: the classic diseases. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughn ED Jr, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC (eds) Campbell’s urology, Vol. 1, 8th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, 17:678.2002
Berger RE, Alexander ER, Monda GD, Ansell J, McCormick G, Holmes KK (1978) Chlamydia trachomatis as a cause of acute “idiopathic” epididymitis. N Engl J Med 298:301
Swain GR, McDonald RA, Pfister JR, Gradus MS, Sedmak GV, Singh A (2004) Decision analysis: point-of-care Chlamydia testing versus laboratory-based methods. Clin Med Res 2:29
Herwig KR, Lapides J, MacLean TA (1971) Response of acute epididymitis to oxyphenbutazone. J Urol 106:890
Furness G, Kamat MH, Kaminski Z, Seebode JJ (1971) The etiology of idiopathic epididymitis. J Urol 106:387
Melekos M, Asbach H (1987) Epididymitis: aspects concerning etiology and treatment. J Urol 138:83
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tracy, C.R., Costabile, R.A. The evaluation and treatment of acute epididymitis in a large university based population: are CDC guidelines being followed?. World J Urol 27, 259–263 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0338-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0338-0