Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bladder and sexual dysfunction are well-documented complications of rectal cancer surgery. This study aimed to determine whether laparoscopy can improve the outcome of these dysfunctions or not.

Methods

The study included 63 of the 116 patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer between 2002 and 2006. Bladder and male sexual function were studied by means of a questionnaire on the basis of the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). In addition, bladder function was determined by means of postvoid residual urine measurement and uroflowmetry. Postoperative functions were compared with the preoperative data to detect subjective functional deterioration. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent open (group 1, n = 29) and laparoscopic (group 2, n = 34) total mesorectal excision.

Results

Only minor disturbances of bladder function were reported for one patient (3%) in group 1 and three patients (9%) in group 2 (p > 0.05). Impotency after surgery was experienced by 6 of 17 preoperatively sexually active males (29%) in group 1 and 1 of 18 males (5%) in group 2 (p = 0.04). Similarly, 5 of 10 women (50 %) in group 1 and 1 of 14 women (7%) in group 2 felt that their overall level of sexual function had decreased as a result of surgery (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Open rectal cancer resection is associated with a higher rate of sexual dysfunction, but not bladder dysfunction, compared with laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery offers a significant advantage with regard to preservation of postoperative sexual function and constitutes a true advance in rectal cancer surgery compared with the open technique. The proposed advantages can be attributed to improvement in visibility by the magnification feature of laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang PL, Fan HA (1983) Urodynamic studies before and/or after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinoma. J Urol 130:948–951

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kinn AC, Ohman U (1986) Bladder and sexual function after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 29:43–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Santangelo ML, Romano G, Sassaroli C (1987) Sexual function after resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 154:502–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fazio VW, Fletcher J, Montague D (1980) Prospective study of the effect of resection of the rectum on male sexual function. World J Surg 4:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heald RJ (1988) The ‘holy Plane’: of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pocard M, Zinzindohoue F, Haab F, Caplin S, Parc R, Tiret E (2002) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 131:368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Masui H, Ike H, Yamaguchi S, Oki S, Shimada H (1996) Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1140–1145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH, Kiebert GM, Kranenbarg WM, van de Velde CJ (1998) Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg 85:92–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Bull-Njaa T, Carlsen E, Eri LM (2000) Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 87:206–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Havenga K, Enker WE, McDermott K, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Guillem J (1996) Male and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 182:495–502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Enker WE, Havenga K, Polyak T, Thaler H, Cranor M (1997) Abdominoperineal resection via total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve preservation for low rectal cancer. World J Surg 21:715–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim NK, Aahn TW, Park JK, Lee KY, Lee WH, Sohn SK, Min JS (2002) Assessment of sexual and voiding function after total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in males with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1178–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pikarsky AJ, Rosenthal R, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2002) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 16:558–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Corno F, Garrone C (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19:1460–1467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, Baldarelli M, Lezoche G, Paganini AM (2006) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surg Endosc 20:546–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lelong B, Bege T, Esterni B, Guiramand J, Turrini O, Moutardier V, Magnin V, Monges G, Pernoud N, Blache JL, Giovannini M, Delpero JR (2007) Short-term outcome after laparoscopic or open restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:176–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mebust W, Roizo R, Schroeder F, Villers A (1991) Correlation between pathology, clinical symptoms and course of the disease. In: Cockett AT, Aso V, Chatelain C et al (eds) Proceeding of the international consultation on benign prostatic hyperplasia. WHO, Geneva, pp 51–62

  19. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49:822–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92:1124–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Keating JP (2004) Sexual function after rectal excision. ANZ J Surg 74:248–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang PL, Fan HA (1983) Urodynamic studies before and/or after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinoma. J Urol 130:948–951

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 89:1551–1556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cosimelli M, Mannella E, Giannarelli D, Casaldi V, Wappner G, Cavaliere F, Consolo S, Appetecchia M, Cavaliere R (1994) Nerve-sparing surgery in 302 resectable rectosigmoid cancer patients: genitourinary morbidity and 10-year survival. Dis Colon Rectum 37(Suppl):S42–S46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Enker WE (1992) Potency, cure, and local control in the operative treatment of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 127:1396–1402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ (2000) Anatomy of Denonvilliers’ fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon. Br J Surg 87:1288–1299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Uchimoto K, Takenaka A, Yajima T, Sugihara K (2006) Operating behind Denonvilliers’ fascia for reliable preservation of urogenital autonomic nerves in total mesorectal excision: a histologic study using cadaveric specimens, including a surgical experiment using fresh cadaveric models. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1024–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, van den Brink M, Maas CP, Martijn H, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T, Kranenbarg EK, Leer JW, Stiggelbout AM (2005) Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23:1847–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oktar Asoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asoglu, O., Matlim, T., Karanlik, H. et al. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23, 296–303 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9870-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9870-7

Keywords

Navigation