Validity of the general health questionnaire and its subscales in patients receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer
References (13)
- et al.
A validation study of three anxiety and depression self-assessment scales
J psychosom Res
(1987) Basic principles of ROC analysis
Seminars Nucl Med
(1978)Measurement of the quality of life after cancer treatment
Br J Hosp Med
(1985)- et al.
Quality of life measurements in patients with malignant disease: a review
J R Soc Med
(1986) Manual of the General Health Questionnaire
(1979)- et al.
Psychological impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in the first two years after mastectomy
Br med J
(1986)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (26)
Identifying psychological distress at key stages of the cancer illness trajectory: A systematic review of validated self-report measures
2011, Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementCitation Excerpt :Pugliese et al.24 proposed a HADS cut-off score of 8 for depression and 10 for anxiety but do not provide sensitivity and specificity scores at these levels. The 28-item GHQ-28 was reported by Hughson et al.23 and demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity scores for identifying what the authors characterize as psychosocial morbidity. The validation data were derived from a sample of 75 breast cancer patients on chemotherapy.
A 1-year prospective study of individual variation in distress, and illness perceptions, after treatment for breast cancer
2005, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchPsychological morbidity in newly referred patients with cancer
1995, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchThe role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review
1992, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyPsychosocial factors in breast cancer and their possible impact upon prognosis
1991, Cancer Treatment Reviews
Copyright © 1988 Published by Elsevier Inc.