Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0Get rights and content

Abstract

This review set out to review the extensive literature on response bias, and particularly dissimulating a socially desirable response to self-report data. Various terminological differences are discussed as well as the way test constructors attempt to measure or overcome social desirability response sets. As an example of the research in this field, four types of studies measuring social desirability in the Eysenckian personality measures (MPI, EPI, EPQ) are reviewed. Also studies of faking in psychiatric symptom inventories, and a wide range of other tests are briefly reviewed. Various equivocal results from attempts to determine what makes some measures more prone to social desirability than others. However there appears to be growing evidence that social desirability is a relatively stable, multidimensional trait, rather than a situationally-specific response set. Faking studies may also be used to examine people's stereotypes and images of normality and abnormality, and various studies of‘abnormal groups’ perception of normality are examined. Recommendations for further work in this area are proposed.

References (104)

  • W. Becker

    Biasing effect of respondents' identification on responses to a social desirability scale: a warning to researchers

    Psychol. Rep.

    (1976)
  • P. Borkenau et al.

    The control of social desirability in personality inventories

    J. Res. Person.

    (1975)
  • J. Braun et al.

    Changes in the Personality Research Form produced by faking instructions

    J. clin. Psychol.

    (1969)
  • J. Braun et al.

    Faking and faking detection on the Personality Research Form

    J. clin. Psychol.

    (1970)
  • J. Braun et al.

    Effects of faking on the Eysenck Personality Inventory

    Psychol. Rep.

    (1966)
  • B. Burkhart et al.

    Item subtlety and faking on the MMPI: a paradoxical relationship

    J. Person. Assess.

    (1978)
  • B. Burkhart et al.

    Psychological mindedness, intelligence and item subtlety endorsement patterns on the MMPI

    J. clin. Psychol.

    (1978)
  • R. Cochrane et al.

    Psychological symptom levels in Indian immigrants to England—a comparison with the native English

    Psychol. Med.

    (1981)
  • C. Cofer et al.

    A study of malingering on the MMPI

    J. Psychol.

    (1949)
  • J. Cohen et al.

    Development of a biographical inventory blank to predict faking on personality tests

    J. appl. Psychol.

    (1974)
  • R. Colligan et al.

    The MMPI: A Contemporary Normative Study

    (1983)
  • S. Crown et al.

    A short diagnostic self-rating scale for psychoneurotic patients: the Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire

    Br. J. Psychiat.

    (1966)
  • D. Crowne et al.

    A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology

    J. consult. Psychol.

    (1960)
  • W. Dahlstrom et al.
    (1972)
  • C. Dicken

    Good impression, social desirability and acquiescence as suppressor variables

    Educ. psychol. Measur.

    (1963)
  • S. Dunnett et al.

    Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality Inventory

    Br. J. Psychol.

    (1981)
  • A. Edwards

    The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research

    (1957)
  • H. Eysenck et al.

    Personality and Individual Differences: a Natural Science Approach

    (1985)
  • H. Eysenck et al.

    The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Manual

    (1975)
  • H. Eysenck et al.

    Psychoticism as a Dimension of Personality

    (1976)
  • H. Eysenck et al.

    The components of Type A behavior and its genetic determinants

    Activitas nervosa Suppl.

    (1982)
  • S. Eysenck et al.

    The interpretation of children's lie scale scores

    Br. J. educ. Psychol.

    (1971)
  • S. Eysenck et al.

    The modification of personality and lie scale scores by special honest instructions

    Br. J. soc. clin. Psychol.

    (1974)
  • F. Farley

    Social desirability extraversion and neuroticism: a learning analysis

    J. Psychol.

    (1966)
  • F. Farley

    Generality of faking effects in the dimensional measurement of personality

    Aust. J. Psychol.

    (1970)
  • F. Farley et al.

    PENmanship: faking the P-E-N

    Br. J. soc. clin. Psychol.

    (1976)
  • N. Feather

    Some personality correlates of external control

    Aust. J. Psychol.

    (1967)
  • A. Furnham

    Assertiveness in three cultures: multidimensionality and cultural differences

    J. clin. Psychol.

    (1979)
  • A. Furnham

    The social desirability of the Type A behaviour pattern

    (1986)
  • A. Furnham et al.

    The mote in thy brother's eye and the beam in thine own: predicting one's own and other's personality test scores

    Br. J. Psychol.

    (1983)
  • W. Gehman

    A study of ability to fake scores on the Strong Vocational Interest Blank for men

    Educ. psychol. measur.

    (1957)
  • P. Gendreau et al.

    Evaluating response set styles on the MMPI with prisoners: faking good adjustment and maladjustment

    Can. J. behav. Sci.

    (1973)
  • D. Goldberg

    The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire

    (1972)
  • H. Goldstein

    A malingering key for mental tests

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1945)
  • B. Gorman

    Social desirability factors in the Eysenck Personality Inventory

    J. Psychol.

    (1968)
  • H. Gough

    Simulated patterns on the MMPI

    J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.

    (1947)
  • J. Graham

    The MMPI: A Practical Guide

    (1978)
  • J. Gray

    Self-rating and Eysenck Personality Inventory estimates of neuroticism and extraversion

    Psychol. Rep.

    (1972)
  • R. Green

    Does a selection situation induce testees to bias their answers on interest and temperament tests?

    Educ. psychol. Measur.

    (1951)
  • Cited by (742)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text