The role of the receptionist in general practice: A ‘dragon behind the desk’?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(85)90347-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The power and influence of receptionists in general practice has been the subject of little research. We argue that the structural position of receptionists and the nature of primary medical care give receptionists a potential discretionary role in determining access to the general practitioner. A major criterion for access is the imputed urgency of the patient's condition, which frequently involves the receptionist making a medical assessment based on only a brief verbal exchange.

The paper draws on interviews with a sample of over 1000 adults about their experiences of the reception process in general practice. The receptionist's role in the following areas is examined; delay in obtaining appointments, asking the reason for surgery consultations and home visits, reducing the number of home visits by suggesting patients attend the surgery, putting patients through to speak to the doctor on the telephone and giving health advice. Patients who have experienced receptionists as an active intermediary are more likely to report interaction difficulties with receptionists. The survey data lend support to two major findings: (1) that as practices become larger and more complex receptionists operate with more rigid rules, leading to greater hostility expressed by patients towards reception staff; and (2) parents with dependent children and young adults express more antagonism, because they are more likely to experience the receptionist as a ‘gatekeeper’ with whom they need to negotiate to see a doctor for acute care for themselves or for their children.

References (22)

  • H. Evers

    Job dissatisfaction amongst medical secretaries: some organisational considerations

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1977)
  • National Consumer Council

    Bureaucracies

  • National Consumer Council

    Bureaucracies

  • I. Deutscher

    The gatekeeper in public housing

  • P.M. Blau

    The Dynamics of Bureaucracy

    (1963)
  • A.S. Hall

    Client reception in a Social Service Agency

    Publ. Admin.

    (1971)
  • A.S. Hall

    The Point of Entry: A Study of Client Reception in The Social Services

    (1974)
  • D. White

    Receptionist power

    New Society

    (1973)
  • D. Mechanic

    Medical Sociology

  • M. Drury et al.

    Enquiry into administrative activities in general practice

    Br. med. J.

    (1970)
  • D.R. Hannay et al.

    The use and perception of a health centre

    Practitioner

    (1977)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Between demarcation and discretion: The medical-administrative boundary as a locus of safety in high-volume organisational routines

      2018, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, recent studies have provided more nuanced perspectives on the relationship between inter-occupational boundaries and patient safety by examining the complex nature of safety and risk in everyday service delivery (Boreham et al., 2000; Grant et al., 2016, 2017; Iedema, 2009; Waring et al., 2016). This work has illustrated the important role of receptionists in upholding safety and quality within the primary care clinical team (Arber and Sawyer, 1985; Swinglehurst and Greenhalgh, 2015), with a recent study by Swinglehurst et al. (2011), for example, examining the ‘hidden creative work’ of front-line receptionist staff in the achievement of prescribing quality and safety in general practice. Two key high-volume routines in UK general practice are repeat prescribing and test results handling.

    • Migrant encounters in the clinic: Bureaucratic, biomedical, and community influences on patient interactions with front-line workers

      2016, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      More broadly, while some ethnographic work addressing clinical bias or racism has focused on nurse–patient interactions (see, for example: Jewkes et al., 1998; Spitzer, 2004), only a few ethnographies have specifically analyzed the role and impact of those who do not provide medical care, but do interact with patients. One early exception to this trend consisted of interviews with patients to assess their perceptions of receptionists; findings indicated that patients saw receptionists as controlling boundaries often outside of their scope of work (Arber and Sawyer, 1985). For example, patients described feeling as if they needed to “negotiate” in order to receive care (p. 914).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors gratefully acknowledge a grant from the Department of Health and Social Security Small Grants Committee which funded this research. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and not of the DHSS.

    View full text