General paper
Determinants of informal caregivers' satisfaction with services for dying cancer patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00198-0Get rights and content

Abstract

The association between bereaved informal caregivers' satisfaction with services delivered by district nurses, general practitioners and hospital doctors, and various service and non-service variables was examined to assess whether satisfaction is a reflection of service characteristics, non-service related factors, or attributable to both. Secondary analysis was undertaken on a sub-sample from the “Regional Study of Care for the Dying” (RSCD) in which bereaved relatives or friends of a random sample of deaths in 1990 in 20 health districts across England were interviewed some ten months after the death. 1858 relatives or close friends/neighbours of people who died from cancer were included in this analysis. Using multiple logistic regression, larger odds ratio were found in association with service than non-service variables. For example, high satisfaction with district nurses was strongly associated with visiting the patient very frequently (OR = 10.8, 95% CI = 4.5–25.9), while the GP visting 20 times or more (OR = 5.5, 95% CI = 3.6–8.5), and informing the informal caregiver of the diagnosis (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 2.3–4.7) were associated with high satisfaction with GPs. However, some non-service variables were significantly associated with satisfaction. For instance, having no bereavement-related psychological problems was positively associated with high satisfaction with district nurses (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.6–3.4) and GPs (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.4–2.8), while the informal caregiver perceiving caring as rewarding as opposed to a burden was positively associated with high satisfaction with district nurses (OR = 3.7, 95% CI = 1.8–7.5) and negatively associated with high satisfaction with hospital doctors (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.24–0.86). The findings indicate that, in post-bereavement surveys evaluating services delivered to dying cancer patients, informal caregivers' satisfaction is mainly determined by service characteristics. However, attributes of both patients and informal caregivers also play an important role.

References (72)

  • C. Seale

    A comparison of hospice and conventional care

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1991)
  • S. Williams et al.

    Convergence and divergence: assessing criteria of consumer satisfaction across general practice, dental and hospital care settings

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1991)
  • B.S. Hulka et al.

    Satisfaction with medical care in low income population

    J. Chron. Dis.

    (1971)
  • J. Hall et al.

    Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1988)
  • C. Seale

    Communication and awareness about death: a study of a random sample of dying people

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1991)
  • World Health Organization

    Quality Assurance in Health Care

    (1989)
  • A. Donabedian

    Evaluating the quality of medical care

    Milbank Mem. Fund Q.

    (1966)
  • R. Hays

    An integrated value-expectancy theory of alcohol and other drug use

    Br. J. Addict.

    (1985)
  • R. Baker

    Development of questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice

    Br. J. Gen. Pract.

    (1990)
  • J. Kincey et al.

    Patient satisfaction and reported acceptance of advice in general practice

    J. R. coll. Gen. Pract.

    (1975)
  • P. Ley

    Satisfaction, compliance and communication

    Br. J. Clin. Psychol.

    (1982)
  • E. Berkanovic et al.

    Satisfaction with health services: some policy implications

    Med. Care

    (1976)
  • J. Lochman

    Factors related to patients satisfaction with their medical care

    J. Commun. Hlth

    (1983)
  • J.E. Ware et al.

    The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction

    Hlth Med. Care Ser. Rev.

    (1978)
  • J.E. Ware

    How to survey patient satisfaction

    Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm.

    (1981)
  • J.E. Ware et al.

    Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with medical encounters

    Med. Care

    (1988)
  • F. Romm et al.

    Correlates of outcomes in patients with congestive heart failure

    Med. Care

    (1976)
  • F. Romm et al.

    Care process and patient outcomes in Diabetus Mellitus

    Med. Care

    (1979)
  • J. Hall et al.

    Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behaviour in medical encounters

    Med. Care

    (1988)
  • J. Greenly et al.

    Organization effects on client satisfaction with humaneness of service

    J. Hlth Soc. Behav.

    (1981)
  • L. Linn et al.

    Physician and patient satisfaction as factors related to the organization of internal medicine group practices

    Med. Care

    (1985)
  • P. Kaim-Caudel et al.

    Patient satisfaction survey in general practice

    Br. Med. J.

    (1975)
  • C.E. Ross et al.

    Client satisfaction and the organization of medical practice: why time counts

    J. Hlth. Behav.

    (1981)
  • R.L. Bashshur et al.

    Consumer satisfaction with group practice: the CHA case

    Am. J. Publ. Hlth

    (1967)
  • I. Higginson et al.

    Evaluation of palliative care: steps to quality assurance

    Palliative Med.

    (1989)
  • D.M. Dush et al.

    Program evaluation in terminal care

    The Hospice J.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (94)

    • Evaluation of care for leukemia and lymphoma patients during their last hospitalization from the perspective of the bereaved family

      2016, Leukemia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is not easy to assess patients’ opinions of care, because most are too ill to complete questionnaires or to be interviewed [13]. For this reason, many evaluations of end-of-life care have used the bereaved family members [14–17]. In this study, we also chose to use bereaved family members as patient proxies.

    • Measuring experience with end-of-life care: A systematic literature review

      2015, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      The reported timing of administration of after-death studies varied substantially from three weeks to one year after death. This variation was likely influenced, in part, by the variation in care settings, the purpose of research for each of the studies, and the availability of after-death data (e.g., the Regional Study of the Dying used samples of death certificates from 20 health districts in the United Kingdom14–16). Some research has shown that timing of after-death surveys may influence the reliability of caregivers' perceptions of their loved ones' pain severity and other physical symptoms at four and nine months.17

    • Factors that affect quality of dying and death in terminal cancer patients on inpatient palliative care units: Perspectives of bereaved family caregivers

      2013, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Direct surveys of these patients are difficult and may be biased because many patients are physically or mentally incapable of participation.1 Surveys of family members often are performed instead.2–6 Previous studies that examined the factors associated with the quality of care in hospice7,8 and satisfaction with hospice9 found that longer hospice stays receive better ratings.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text