Readability formulas: Cautions and criteria
References (26)
Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials
Ann Emergency Med
(1988)- et al.
A set of thirty-six prose passages calibrated for complexity
J Verb Learn Verb Behav
(1967) - et al.
Readability formulas may mislead you
Patient Educ Courts
(1985) Reading level: a metaphor that shapes practice
Phi Delta Kappa
(1987)Readability formulae and McCall-Crabbs Standard Test Lessons in Reading
Read Teach
(1980)- et al.
Improving patient comprehension of literature on smoking
Am J Publ Health
(1989) Can clients understand our instruction?
Image: J Nurs Scholar
(1986)- et al.
Consent forms readability, and comprehension: the need for new assessment tools
Law Med Health
(1985) - et al.
Level of reading difficulty in ACOG patient education pamphlets
Obstet Gynecol
(1989) The validity of the Miller-Coleman readability scale
Read Res Q
(1969)
A new readability yardstick
J Appl Psychol
The FOG index after twenty years
J Bus Commun
Fry's readability graph: clarifications, validity and extension to level 17
J Read
Cited by (219)
Optimizing readability using genetic algorithms
2024, Knowledge-Based SystemsReadability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine
2021, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :It has been found to overestimate the readability of patient education materials in some cases owing to its lower level of expected comprehension criteria.18 Other problems with readability formulas are that they are exclusively based on the length and structure of a sentence and do not account for other factors that affect understanding, such as illustrations, page layout, grammatical errors, and motivation of the reader.22,38,39 Finally, the present study only used a singular search engine, Google, and thus could not account for the patients who would use another search engine and might encounter different health-related articles.
Simple contents and good readability: Improving health literacy for LEP populations
2020, International Journal of Medical InformaticsCitation Excerpt :Health information should be judged beyond just the readability of the text. One of the biggest critiques of readability formulas is that it does not take the patient into consideration [33,43]. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [44] recommends that readability formulas be used in meaningful ways, with a clear understanding of what each formula is measuring.
Readability of Wikipedia pages on andrology and gynecology: comparative study
2023, Universal Access in the Information SocietyPatient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction: Content Validity and Readability
2023, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchFamily partnerships: Implications from the digital world
2023, Meaningful and Active Family Engagement: IEP, Transition and Technology Integration in Special Education