Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 381, Issue 9866, 16–22 February 2013, Pages 585-597
The Lancet

Series
Inequalities in non-communicable diseases and effective responses

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61851-0Get rights and content

Summary

In most countries, people who have a low socioeconomic status and those who live in poor or marginalised communities have a higher risk of dying from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) than do more advantaged groups and communities. Smoking rates, blood pressure, and several other NCD risk factors are often higher in groups with low socioeconomic status than in those with high socioeconomic status; the social gradient also depends on the country's stage of economic development, cultural factors, and social and health policies. Social inequalities in risk factors account for more than half of inequalities in major NCDs, especially for cardiovascular diseases and lung cancer. People in low-income countries and those with low socioeconomic status also have worse access to health care for timely diagnosis and treatment of NCDs than do those in high-income countries or those with higher socioeconomic status. Reduction of NCDs in disadvantaged groups is necessary to achieve substantial decreases in the total NCD burden, making them mutually reinforcing priorities. Effective actions to reduce NCD inequalities include equitable early childhood development programmes and education; removal of barriers to secure employment in disadvantaged groups; comprehensive strategies for tobacco and alcohol control and for dietary salt reduction that target low socioeconomic status groups; universal, financially and physically accessible, high-quality primary care for delivery of preventive interventions and for early detection and treatment of NCDs; and universal insurance and other mechanisms to remove financial barriers to health care.

Introduction

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) cause 35 million of the 53 million annual deaths worldwide; more than three-quarters of these deaths occur in low-income and middle-income countries.1, 2 A substantial amount of the worldwide NCD burden is attributable to behavioural, dietary, environmental, and metabolic risk factors3, 4, 5—a fact that has attracted worldwide attention to NCDs as a major global health issue and has shown the need for improved prevention and treatment.1 In particular, NCDs were the subject of a UN high-level meeting in September, 2011. Goals and targets for NCD mortality and risk factors have been proposed, and mechanisms envisioned to increase accountability to the commitments made by measurement and reporting of progress in NCD outcomes, risk factors, and treatment.6, 7

Several studies, mainly from high-income countries, have shown that NCD rates are higher in disadvantaged and marginalised people and communities than in groups with higher socioeconomic status.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 Less is known about within-country NCD inequalities in low-income and middle-income countries, and about how inequalities differ in relation to the stage of economic and epidemiological development. Furthermore, within-country NCD inequalities have not received explicit attention in global NCD discussions. Although the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) do not specifically address within-country equity, social inequalities in MDGs and their interventions are large, and reduction of these inequalities will help to achieve the MDGs.26 The scarcity of similar worldwide evidence for NCDs creates difficulties in formulation and implementation of actions that reduce NCD inequalities, and in assessment of how these actions might help to decrease the total NCD burden.

Key messages

Key actions to reduce non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and NCD inequalities, globally and within countries, are:

  • Enhancement and improvement of early childhood development programmes and education for all social groups, and removal of barriers to secure employment

  • Taxation of tobacco and alcohol, regulation of their production and sales, and restriction of advertising and marketing of these products

  • Reduction of dietary salt intake by regulation, well-designed public education, and mass media campaigns that target disadvantaged and marginalised social groups, and perhaps negotiated voluntary actions by food manufacturers

  • Improvement of financial and physical access of disadvantaged and marginalised social groups to healthier diets, including fresh fruits and vegetables, healthy fats, and whole grains through subsidies, agricultural policies, and possibly through improved availability in grocery stores; and implementation of taxes and regulations or restrictions of foods that contain high amounts of sugars, processed carbohydrates, and saturated fats

  • Implementation of universal, financially and physically accessible, high-quality primary care to reduce NCD risk factors through clinical interventions and to enhance early detection and treatment of NCDs

  • Implementation of universal health insurance or other mechanisms to remove financial barriers to health care, reduction of physical and behavioural barriers to health-care use, and improvement of quality of care in disadvantaged communities

We provide an overview of global and within-country inequalities in NCD outcomes, risk factors, and interventions, with examples from countries at all stages of economic development and in different regions. Although we discuss NCDs in general, in examples we refer specifically to cancers, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and chronic respiratory diseases—four disease groups that together account for more than 80% of NCD deaths and are included in global goals.6 We then focus on effective actions to reduce NCD inequalities.

Section snippets

NCD outcomes

NCDs are often thought to increase with affluence and westernisation. In reality, this notion applies only to some NCDs, such as colorectal and breast cancers, which are more prevalent in high-income than in low-income countries. The rise in crude death rates from other NCDs as economic development progresses is mainly attributable to population ageing. The age-standardised death rate for most NCDs is lower in high-income countries than in low-income and middle-income countries (figure 1).

NCD outcomes

Studies in high-income countries, especially those outside Asia, have shown that NCD mortality is higher in people with low education, income, or social class;8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 those in marginalised ethnic groups (panel);18, 19, 20, 21 and those living in poor and deprived communities.22, 23, 24, 25 These socioeconomic gradients are generally smaller, and for some diseases even reversed, in southern Europe and Asia.9, 10, 49, 50

Figure 3 shows age-standardised cancer and

What can be done about NCD inequalities?

The available worldwide data show that NCD mortality and most NCD risk factors are higher in low-income and middle-income countries than in high-income countries. NCDs and some of their most important risk factors tend to be higher in people and communities with a lower socioeconomic status within the same country, but differences in within-country patterns depend on the stage of economic development, and especially on social, economic, and health policies. Social inequalities in risk factors

References (115)

  • MP Coleman et al.

    Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD)

    Lancet Oncol

    (2008)
  • R Sankaranarayanan et al.

    Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and Central America: a population-based study

    Lancet Oncol

    (2010)
  • K Kotseva et al.

    Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countries

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • S Yusuf et al.

    Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey

    Lancet

    (2011)
  • PC Webster

    Canada curbs Aboriginal health leadership

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • S Kagamimori et al.

    Socioeconomic status and health in the Japanese population

    Soc Sci Med

    (2009)
  • YH Khang et al.

    The contribution of material, psychosocial, and behavioral factors in explaining educational and occupational mortality inequalities in a nationally representative sample of South Koreans: relative and absolute perspectives

    Soc Sci Med

    (2009)
  • Y Fujino et al.

    A nationwide cohort study of educational background and major causes of death among the elderly population in Japan

    Prev Med

    (2005)
  • CL Chang et al.

    The influence of economic development on the association between education and the risk of acute myocardial infarction and stroke

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2002)
  • FC Pampel et al.

    Obesity, SES, and economic development: a test of the reversal hypothesis

    Soc Sci Med

    (2012)
  • P Jha et al.

    Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • GD Smith et al.

    Mortality differences between black and white men in the USA: contribution of income and other risk factors among men screened for the MRFIT

    Lancet

    (1998)
  • M Kivimaki et al.

    Best-practice interventions to reduce socioeconomic inequalities of coronary heart disease mortality in UK: a prospective occupational cohort study

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • JT Denney et al.

    Education inequality in mortality: the age and gender specific mediating effects of cigarette smoking

    Soc Sci Res

    (2010)
  • F Farzadfar et al.

    Effectiveness of diabetes and hypertension management by rural primary health-care workers (Behvarz workers) in Iran: a nationally representative observational study

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • M Marmot et al.

    WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • JP Mackenbach

    The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states: the explanation of a paradox

    Soc Sci Med

    (2012)
  • DO Abegunde et al.

    The economic impact of chronic diseases: how do households respond to shocks? Evidence from Russia

    Soc Sci Med

    (2008)
  • Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010

    (2011)
  • R Beaglehole et al.

    Independent global accountability for NCDs

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • JP Mackenbach et al.

    Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • M Avendano et al.

    Socioeconomic status and ischaemic heart disease mortality in 10 western European populations during the 1990s

    Heart

    (2006)
  • JP Mackenbach et al.

    Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular disease mortality; an international study

    Eur Heart J

    (2000)
  • T Blakely et al.

    Inequalities in mortality during and after restructuring of the New Zealand economy: repeated cohort studies

    BMJ

    (2008)
  • JJ Feldman et al.

    National trends in educational differentials in mortality

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1989)
  • L Kilander et al.

    Education, lifestyle factors and mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer. A 25-year follow-up of Swedish 50-year-old men

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2001)
  • G Pappas et al.

    The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States, 1960 and 1986

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • CV Chapin

    Deaths among taxpayers and non-taxpayers income tax, Providence, 1865

    Am J Public Health (N Y)

    (1924)
  • S Harper et al.

    Trends in the black–white life expectancy gap in the United States, 1983–2003

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • RA Hahn et al.

    Life expectancy in four U.S. racial/ethnic populations: 1990

    Epidemiology

    (1995)
  • CJL Murray et al.

    Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States

    PLoS Med

    (2006)
  • M Tobias et al.

    Changing trends in indigenous inequalities in mortality: lessons from New Zealand

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2009)
  • M Ezzati et al.

    The reversal of fortunes: trends in county mortality and cross-county mortality disparities in the United States

    PLoS Med

    (2008)
  • GK Singh

    Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969–1998

    Am J Public Health (N Y)

    (2003)
  • M Eames et al.

    Social deprivation and premature mortality—regional comparison across England

    BMJ

    (1993)
  • MW Massing et al.

    Income, income inequality, and cardiovascular disease mortality: relations among county populations of the United States, 1985 to 1994

    Southern Med J

    (2004)
  • E Gakidou et al.

    Improving child survival through environmental and nutritional interventions—the importance of targeting interventions toward the poor

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • O Ahmad et al.

    Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. GPE discussion paper series no. 31

    (2001)
  • M Ezzati et al.

    Can noncommunicable diseases be prevented? Lessons from studies of populations and individuals

    Science

    (2012)
  • HV Hogerzeil et al.

    Promotion of access to essential medicines for non-communicable diseases: practical implications of the UN political declaration

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • Cited by (491)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    These authors contributed equally to the manuscript and are listed alphabetically

    View full text