ArticlesEffectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in England: an observational study
Introduction
In the UK, pertussis-containing vaccines have been used in infancy since 1957, at an accelerated schedule (at 2, 3, and 4 months of age) since 1990, and with acellular pertussis since 2004.1 High coverage during the past two decades, combined with the 2001 introduction of a preschool booster for acellular pertussis from 3 years and 4 months of age, has achieved good disease control without additional boosters at older ages.1 However, in late 2011, a national increase in confirmed pertussis cases was reported, initially restricted to adolescents and adults, but extending to young infants in 2012.2 Resurgence of pertussis has recently been reported in several countries,3, 4, 5 but the reasons are not yet fully understood. The improved availability of methods to confirm diagnosis (eg, serology and PCR), increased awareness among health professionals, and waning natural or vaccine immunity during periods of low pertussis activity have been suggested.5 Changes in Bordetella pertussis organisms and decreased duration of protection or effectiveness against transmission with acellular pertussis vaccines (by comparison with whole-cell vaccines) have also been described.5
The high rates of disease in infants younger than 3 months and a concomitant increase in pertussis-related infant deaths led to an urgent review of potential control strategies by the UK's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. In September, 2012, the UK Department of Health recommended a temporary programme to offer a five-component acellular-pertussis-containing vaccine, Repevax (Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Maidenhead, UK)—a diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (acellular, component), and poliomyelitis (inactivated) vaccine, also known as dTaP/IPV—to all women between 28 and 38 weeks of pregnancy.6 Repevax was available without delay in sufficient quantities required for the UK programme. Although the WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety has pronounced the safety of vaccination with inactivated vaccines in pregnancy, the effectiveness of a maternal immunisation programme for pertussis has not been shown.7 We aimed to provide the first estimates of the effectiveness of a maternal pertussis vaccination programme in prevention of infant disease in England.
Section snippets
Participants and data sources
For vaccine effectiveness calculations, we used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a primary care dataset containing anonymised information for patients registered at 520 English general practices, which are representative of the population of England in terms of geographical distribution.8 For each patient, basic demographic information, details of every consultation and diagnosis, and vaccination history are recorded. We estimated maternal vaccine coverage using CPRD
Results
We estimated maternal vaccine coverage from English practices in the CPRD based on 26 684 women with a livebirth from Oct 1, 2012 (week 40, 2012) until Sept 3, 2013 (week 36, 2013). This figure represents about 4% of all livebirths in England in 2012 (694 241).12 Maternal coverage by week of delivery peaked at 500 (78%) of 638 women in week 2, 2013, then fell gradually to 144 (60%) of 241 women giving birth in week 35, 2013 (end of August; figure 1). We compared these data with national data,
Discussion
In the UK, pertussis vaccination for pregnant women was introduced at a time of heightened pertussis activity and a substantial rise in infant deaths.6 The programme rapidly achieved coverage approaching 60%.9 Although efficient placental transfer of pertussis antibodies has been shown after recent maternal immunisation with acellular vaccine,13, 14, 15 we provide the first evidence of the effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy to prevent infant disease (panel).
In England,
References (31)
- et al.
Sources of pertussis infection in young infants: a review of key evidence informing targeting of the cocoon strategy
Vaccine
(2013) - et al.
Accelerating control of pertussis in England and Wales
Emerg Infect Dis
(2012) Strategies to control pertussis in infants
Arch Dis Child
(2013)- et al.
Seroprevalence of pertussis in The Netherlands: evidence for increased circulation of Bordetella pertussis
PLoS One
(2010) - et al.
Increased population prevalence of low pertussis toxin antibody levels in young children preceding a record pertussis epidemic in Australia
PLoS One
(2012) - et al.
Pertussis resurgence: perspectives from the working group meeting on pertussis on the causes, possible paths forward, and gaps in our knowledge
J Infect Dis
(2014) Temporary programme of pertussis (whooping cough) vaccination of pregnant women
Wkly Epidemiol Rec
(2013)- et al.
Orlistat and the risk of acute liver injury: self controlled case series study in UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
BMJ
(2013) Pertussis vaccination programme for pregnant women: vaccine coverage estimates in England, October 2012 to September 2013. Health Protection Report 2013, Volume 7 Number 51
Modelling anti-pertussis toxin IgG antibody decay following primary and preschool vaccination with an acellular pertussis vaccine in UK subjects using a modified oral fluid assay
J Med Microbiol
Estimation of vaccine effectiveness using the screening method
Int J Epidemiol
Statistical bulletin: births in England and Wales, 2012
Prevalence of pertussis antibodies in maternal delivery, cord, and infant serum
J Infect Dis
Importance of timing of maternal combined tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization and protection of young infants
Clin Infect Dis
Cited by (586)
Maternal immune factors involved in the prevention or facilitation of neonatal bacterial infections
2024, Cellular ImmunologyAntibody and B-cell Immune Responses Against Bordetella Pertussis Following Infection and Immunization
2023, Journal of Molecular Biology