Research reportAre effects of depression management training for General Practitioners on patient outcomes mediated by improvements in the process of care?
Introduction
Recent reviews point out significant shortcomings in the management of depression in primary care settings. A significant proportion of patients with active depression seen by General Practitioners (GPs) remain undiagnosed (Ormel et al., 1991, Eisenberg, 1992, Üstün and Sartorius, 1995, Tiemens et al., 1996) and even when depression is accurately diagnosed, many do not receive adequate dosage and duration of antidepressant treatment (Thompson and Thompson, 1989, Katon et al., 1992, Katon et al., 1995, Maddox et al., 1994, Donoghue and Tylee, 1996, Johnson et al., 1996, Gregor et al., 1998, Lawrenson et al., 2000). This suggests the need for training programs for GPs targeting the process of care for depression.
We developed an active hands-on training program that offered both specific diagnostic and management guidelines for depression and training in general clinical approaches to mental illness, including communication skills (Jenner et al., 1995). Ormel et al. (1998), van Os et al., 1999, van Os et al., 2002 and Tiemens et al. (1999) reported the effects of this training program. GP treatment regimens improved in accordance with treatment guidelines. Antidepressant treatment increased significantly from 24% to 40%. Adequate dosage and duration increased from 47% to 84% of all patients prescribed an antidepressant for depression. Communicative skillfulness of GPs improved from 37% to 72%.
Regarding patient outcomes, Tiemens et al. (1999) found positive but small effects for depressed patients. At the 3-months follow-up, the depressed patients of trained physicians had less symptomatology than depressed patients of the same physicians prior to the training. For a subgroup of depressed patients, however, stronger effects were found. This subgroup consisted of patients with an episode duration less than 12 months at the time of the index visit (‘recent onset’) who were also recognised by their physician as having a mental health problem. At the 3-months follow-up, the post-training patients from this subgroup had less severe symptomatology, better daily functioning and less activity limitation days than the pre-training group had at the 3-months follow-up. In addition, the median duration of the episode was 5 weeks shorter for the post-training group than for the pre-training group.
The present study examines whether the observed training effects on 3-months patient outcomes were caused by the observed improvements in process of care, and if so, which process of care variables were responsible for these better patient outcomes. Both depression-specific aspects (recognition; accuracy of depression diagnosis; prescription of antidepressant; adequate dosage and duration of antidepressant treatment) and a non-specific one (communicative skillfulness of the GP) as well as a combination of adequate antidepressant treatment and communicative skillfulness were examined. Our analysis targets all patients with a recent onset ICD-10 depression, irrespective of whether the depressed patient was recognised by the GP as having a mental health problem, because firstly, recognition by the GP is one of the potential mediators of improvement in patient outcomes, and secondly, as a result of the training, the case mix of the patient groups recognised by the GPs before and after the training may differ. For example, after the training GPs may recognise more patients with mild symptomatology or disability who are known to have a better prognosis (van den Brink et al., 2002). Because we did not find a training effect on episode duration for the current sample of all recent onset depression cases, we restricted our analyses to the changes over the 3-months follow-up period in severity of symptomatology, level of daily functioning and activity limitation days.
Section snippets
Patient and data collection
The present study was carried out in the context of an intervention study designed to evaluate the effects of a post-academic training program (Jenner et al., 1995) on the process of care for depression and patient outcomes in primary care (Ormel et al., 1998, van Os et al., 1999, van Os et al., 2002, Tiemens et al., 1999). Although the study has been described extensively in earlier publications, we present an outline of the recruitment and data collection procedures.
Independent samples of
Patient, illness and process of care characteristics
A total of 174 patients with a recent onset ICD-10 depression were identified in the pre- and post-training samples (N pre=85; N post=89). Of these, 76 patients were missing one of the patient outcome variables. The dropouts did not show significant differences from the study sample on patient characteristics, illness characteristics or process of care variables.
Pre and post differences in process of care
Table 1 shows the pre- and post-training recognition rates and accuracy of diagnosis as well as the treatment of all recent onset
Discussion
The present study aimed to examine whether observed improvements in patient outcomes were caused by improvements in process of care. We examined the patients with a recent onset depression. What did we find? Recognition and accuracy of diagnosis did not mediate the patient outcome, probably because these process of care variables did not improve by the training. The provision of an antidepressant did improve, but this improvement was not responsible for the observed training effect on patient
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the participating general practitioners, the research workers who interviewed the patients, and H. Hallie for the data entry.
References (29)
- et al.
Predictability of the one-year course of depression and generalized anxiety in primary care
Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry
(2002) - et al.
Rethinking practitioner roles in chronic illness: the specialist, primary care physician, and practice nurse
Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry
(2001) - et al.
The treatment of depression in UK general practice: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants compared
J. Affect. Disord.
(2000) - et al.
The effectiveness of psychotherapy in treating depressive disorders in primary care practice: clinical and cost perspectives
Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry
(2002) - et al.
Training primary care physicians improves the management of depression
Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry
(1999) - et al.
Effects on depression pharmacotherapy of a Dutch general practitioner training program
J. Affect. Disord.
(2002) - et al.
Psychotherapy process in the NIMH Collaborative Study of Depression Research Program
J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.
(1999) - et al.
The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory
Behav. Sci.
(1974) - et al.
The treatment of depression; prescribing patterns of antidepressants in primary care in the UK
Br. J. Psychiatry
(1996) Treating depression and anxiety in primary care. Closing the gap between knowledge and practice
N. Engl. J. Med.
(1992)