Peer-initiated overdose resuscitation: fellow drug users could be mobilised to implement resuscitation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(00)00070-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Research interviews about overdose experiences were conducted with 115 patients attending a methadone maintenance clinic in south London, UK. While almost half (49.6%) reported having experienced overdose personally (on an average of four occasions each), almost all (97.4%) reported that they had witnessed overdoses (on an average of six occasions each). This represents a total of 706 overdoses witnessed, of which 106 had resulted in fatalities. The vast majority of patients (86/97) reported that they had taken actions when they had witnessed overdoses with those acting taking an average of nearly threee different actions on the last occasion on which they had seen someone overdosing. Most respondents reported that they would be willing to act, even if they did not know the overdose victim personally and that they had not been deterred from acting by the previous response from the emergency services. Fear of punishment was not a strong deterrent from acting certainly not for this sample, with many participants also expressing an interest in expanding their repertoire of overdose interventions, for example through training in resuscitation techniques and by keeping naloxone at home for use in overdose emergency.

Introduction

Opiate addicts have been found to have an increased mortality rate, with an annual mortality approximately 10–20 times greater than for an age-matched non-addict population (Ghodse et al., 1978, Davoli et al., 1993, Frischer et al., 1993, Oppenheimer et al., 1994, Hammersley et al., 1995, Farrell et al., 1996, Darke and Zador, 1996).

Overdose is a not an infrequent occurrence amongst opiate misusers. In studies in the UK (Gossop et al., 1996, Powis et al., 1999) and in Australia (Darke et al., 1996, McGregor et al., 1998), about half of the interviewed injecting heroin users had themselves previously experienced an overdose, with an even larger number having witnessed an overdose by another drug misuser. Specific enquiry into the reasons for the overdose have established that only a minority of these overdoses are associated with suicidal intent (Vingoe et al., 1999, Neale, 2000, Best et al., 2000a), and hence such overdoses may usefully be considered as an occupational hazard of a career as an injecting heroin user, and one whose likelihood the user may be particularly keen to find ways to reduce.

These overdoses are extensively witnessed. In earlier work from our group (Powis et al., 1999, Strang et al., 1999a), specific enquiry was made about the circumstances of the last occasion of overdose for the 117 subjects who had previously overdosed, of whom 95 (81%) had been with someone else when they had last overdosed, usually a close friend or sexual partner. Further enquiry was made from this group about their witnessing of the overdoses of other drug users, where the closeness of their relationship to the drug user who had overdosed was again evident, including in the instances where the overdose had resulted in death (Strang et al., 1999a, Strang et al., 1999b).

Management of witnessed overdoses (by fellow drug takers) is often inept, flawed or even counterproductive. Folklore includes such inefficient or dangerous advice as intravenous salt, stimulants, immersion in a cold bath and, perhaps most extraordinarily, intravenous milk (Drenick, 1970). Both Darke et al. (1996) and Powis et al. (1999) report on the delay and reluctance to call an ambulance. Written and film media contain examples of desperate and inefficient interventions including, classically, the fictional scene of heroin overdose in the film ‘Pulp fiction’, in which, in utter desperation, fellow drug users attempt resuscitation with direct intra-cardiac adrenalin (certainly not a recommended course of action).

Given the extensive witnessing of overdoses, serious consideration is now being given to the possibility that peer drug takers might be a valuable target group for training in resuscitation techniques. However, as yet, only minimal data have been collected on whether drug users would generally be willing to consider involvement in such resuscitation or whether the fear of involvement (and possible involvement with ambulance personnel and police) might represent insuperable obstacles. We report on the exploration of these issues amongst a sample of opiate addicts undergoing treatment in London.

Section snippets

Method

The sample consisted of 115 opiate addicts attending a methadone maintenance clinic in South London in 1999. As has previously been reported (Gossop et al., 1988, Strang et al., 1992, Griffiths et al., 1994, Strang et al., 1998), London samples of heroin users now contain a substantial proportion who take their heroin by ‘chasing the dragon’ (Gossop et al., 1988, Griffiths et al., 1994) amongst whom a history of overdose has been found to be rare with almost all of the overdose histories being

Characteristics of the study sample and their personal overdose histories

The study sample comprised 115 opiate addicts in methadone maintenance treatment, of whom 80 (69.6%) were male (male/female ratio of 2.3/1). Mean age of the sample was 36.1 years (S.D.=7.6). Mean age of first heroin use was 19.8 years, as was mean age of first injection. The mean age at which the subjects had first commenced methadone treatment was 27.4 years.

A history of previous overdose was obtained from 49.6% (57) of the 115 subjects, amongst whom there had been an average of 4.1 overdoses.

Discussion

Two important observations can be made from these findings which lend further support to observations made by ourselves and others from earlier studies. Firstly, as observed earlier (Darke et al., 1996, Darke and Zador, 1996, Powis et al., 1999) there is widespread experience of the witnessing of the overdoses of fellow drug users — virtually all (97%) of this study sample from a methadone treatment programme had at some time witnessed an overdose, including more than a quarter who had

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the family research grant support provided from a trust fund through the charity Action on Addiction. Data from this paper were presented at the international conference on drug overdose in Seattle, Washington, USA in January 2000.

References (31)

  • D. Best et al.

    Accidental and deliberate overdoses amongst opiate addicts: are deliberate overdoses systematically different?

    Drug and Alcohol Review

    (2000)
  • Best D, Man L, Gossop M, Noble A, Strang J. Drug users’ experiences of witnessing overdoses: what do they know and what...
  • S. Darke et al.

    Fatal heroin ‘overdose’: a review

    Addiction

    (1996)
  • S. Darke et al.

    Overdose among heroin users in Sydney, Australia: II. Responses to overdose

    Addiction

    (1996)
  • M. Davoli et al.

    Risk factors for overdose mortality: a case control study within a cohort of intravenous drug users

    International Journal of Epidemiology

    (1993)
  • A. Deehan et al.

    The general practitioner, the drug misuser and the alcohol misuser: major differences in general practitioner activity, therapeutic commitment, and ‘shared care’ proposals

    British Journal of General Practice

    (1997)
  • A. Deehan et al.

    Low detection rates, negative attitudes and the failure to meet the ‘Health of the Nation’ alcohol targets: findings from a national survey of GPs in England and Wales

    Drug and Alcohol Review

    (1998)
  • A. Deehan et al.

    Who in the primary health care team can tackle alcohol misuse?

    Journal of Substance Use

    (1999)
  • A. Deehan et al.

    Are practice nurses an unexplored resource in the identification and management of alcohol misuse? results from a study of practice nurses in England and Wales in 1995

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1999)
  • E.J. Drenick

    Heroin overdose complicated by intravenous injection of milk

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1970)
  • M. Farrell et al.

    Suicide and overdose among opiate addicts

    Addiction

    (1996)
  • M. Frischer et al.

    Mortality among injecting drug users: a critical reappraisal

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (1993)
  • A.H. Ghodse et al.

    Mortality among addicts in Greater London

    British Medical Journal

    (1978)
  • M. Gossop et al.

    Chasing the dragon: characteristics of heroin chasers

    British Journal of Addiction

    (1988)
  • M. Gossop et al.

    Frequency of non-fatal heroin overdose: survey of heroin users recruited in non-clinical settings

    British Medical Journal

    (1996)
  • Cited by (66)

    • A randomized clinical trial of the effects of brief versus extended opioid overdose education on naloxone utilization outcomes by individuals with opioid use disorder

      2022, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Worldwide, an estimated 27 million people have opioid use disorder (OUD). Overdose is the leading cause of premature mortality among individuals with OUD, people with OUD typically experience several non-fatal overdose events, and some studies estimate that over 90% have witnessed an overdose (Degenhardt et al., 2013; Darke et al., 2011; Lagu et al., 2006; Strang et al., 2000; Tracy et al., 2005; Smyth et al., 2007; Wagner et al., 2015; World Health Organization, 2018). In an effort to reduce overdose mortality, peer-based overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) has grown to become a widely used harm reduction practice in the United States (U.S.) and around the world (Davis et al., 2017).

    • The ecology of overdose mortality in Philadelphia

      2020, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this sense, fear of legal penalties has the potential to isolate persons experiencing overdose symptoms from critical medical care, thus increasing the likelihood of subsequent death. In spite of over 70% of PWUD reporting that they have witnessed an overdose (Strang et al., 2000; Darke and Ross, 1997; Davidson et al., 2002), most are unlikely to seek emergency services (Lim et al., 2019; Tobin et al., 2005; Tracy et al., 2005). PWUD are keenly aware that police contact can set in motion supplementary ramifications aside from the effects of judicial processing and detainment.

    • Emergency department utilization and subsequent prescription drug overdose death

      2015, Annals of Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Preventive interventions targeted at ED patients at high risk for PDO death, may include advice such as not mixing opioids with sedatives or alcohol [16], or targeted patient education initiatives [17]. Furthermore, identifying high risk populations can help medical practitioners decide whom to target with screening, intervention (e.g., take-home naloxone), and treatment program referrals [18–24]. Despite the importance of the ED as a key clinical entry point for patients at high risk of PDO, the relationship between ED utilization patterns and subsequent drug overdose death is understudied.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text