Research articleScreening for Physical Activity in Family Practice: Evaluation of Two Brief Assessment Tools
Introduction
The promotion of physical activity (PA) is essential for curbing the escalating levels of obesity evident worldwide and for addressing the growing burden of preventable chronic conditions.1 In Australia, the United States, and other nations, the prevalence of physical inactivity exceeds 50%,2, 3, 4 highlighting the importance of finding effective strategies for promoting PA in populations.
Among the range of agents who can contribute to increasing PA, physicians have an important role to play because most people visit a family practitioner at least once a year,5 and many regard their physician as their preferred source of health advice.6 While reviews of PA intervention studies in healthcare settings have reached diverse conclusions,7, 8 the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Healthy People 2010)9 and the American Heart Association10 recommend that physicians advise their patients about PA because of its clinical relevance to many conditions and its broader public health significance.
The 5As approach (assess, advise, agree, assist, arrange)11 is a guide for offering behavior change interventions in family practice that may be applied to PA. The elements of this approach follow: assessing behavioral risk factors and patient propensity for change, advising about behavior changes and the benefits of these, agreeing to goals and strategies for change, assisting with behavior modification and social support strategies, and arranging follow-up contacts and referral to specialized assistance.
Assessment is the first of the 5As, highlighting the need for a reliable and accurate assessment of PA for physicians wanting to address this behavior among patients. Instruments with acceptable reliability and validity are available to assess smoking,12 alcohol use,13 and dietary habits14 in primary health care, but PA assessments have not yet been thoroughly developed and tested. A PA assessment used in the Physical Activity Counseling for Exercise (PACE) program15 had acceptable test–retest reliability, but its validity has not been reported. Physical activity assessments have also been developed for use by U.S. healthcare providers,16 and general practitioners in the United Kingdom17; however, the reliability and validity of these assessments has not been reported. A number of single-question measures of PA have been developed for use in epidemiologic studies,18, 19, 20 but none are reported to have been evaluated in primary health care.
A PA assessment tool meant for use in primary care should be acceptable to time-pressured physicians and be able to clearly identify patients who could benefit from interventions to address this behavior. A two-question PA assessment was recently pilot tested in family practices in Australia and found to be feasible for physician use, and to have moderate reliability and validity.21 The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, test–retest reliability, concurrent and criterion validity of this two-question assessment, and of a longer three-question version, in a larger sample of Australian primary care physicians and patients.
Section snippets
Physician and Patient Recruitment
Family physicians in Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane were recruited by advertisements in Division of General Practice newsletters, faxed invitation letters, and direct telephone contact. Eight physicians were recruited in both Sydney and Brisbane and 12 in Melbourne, from a total of 21 practices. Each physician was offered a $100 book voucher for participating.
Eligible patients were aged >18 years, able to communicate in English, and not affected by mobility or cognitive impairments. The study
Study Participants
The characteristics of the 467 participants who were administered a brief assessment by their family physician, and then completed a repeat assessment by the exercise physiologist and/or 5 to 7 days of accelerometer monitoring are shown in Table 2. Participants receiving the 2Q and 3Q did not differ in any of these characteristics.
Test–Retest Reliability
The Spearman’s rank-order coefficients showed a significant positive correlation between the amount of moderate, vigorous, and total PA reported by participants on
Discussion
This study comprehensively evaluated two brief PA assessment tools that were developed for use in routine family practice. Brief assessments of this type are an important element of the systems required to improve the integration of preventive counseling into medical practice.28
The test–retest reliability results for both brief assessments were encouraging, particularly as these were administered by different professionals, in different contexts, on two occasions. It is well documented that
References (40)
- et al.
Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians
Prev Med
(1997) - et al.
Estimation of fruit and vegetable intake using a two-item dietary questionnairea potential tool for primary health care workers
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
(2003) - et al.
Mediators of change in physical activity following an intervention in primary carephysical activityCE
Prev Med
(1997) - et al.
Reproducibility and relative validity of the Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity
J Clin Epidemiol
(2003) - et al.
The public health usefulness of the exercise recreation and sport survey (ERASS) surveillance system
J Sci Med Sport
(2004) - et al.
Why a global strategy on diet, physical activity and health? The growing burden of non-communicable diseases
Public Health Nutr
(2004) Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults – United States 2000–2001
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
(2003)- et al.
Physical activity patterns of Australian adults
Results of the 1999 National Physical Activity Survey
(2000) - National Centre for Social Research. Health Survey of England 2003. Vol. 2: risk factors for cardiovascular disease....
- et al.
Summary health statistics for U.S. adultsNational Health Interview Survey, 2002
Vital Health Stat
(2004)
Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studieseffectiveness and implications for practice and future research
J Fam Pract
Healthy people 2010
With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health
How to implement physical activity in primary and secondary prevention
Circulation
Tools for physical activity counseling in medical practice
Obes Res
Assessing nicotine dependence
Am Fam Physician
Screening for alcohol problems in primary carea systematic review
Arch Intern Med
Assessment of health risk behaviorsa tool to inform consumers, providers, health care organizations, and purchasers
Am J Prev Med
Dietary and exercise assessment in general practice
Fam Pract
Measuring physical activity with a single question
Am J Public Health
Cited by (113)
Editor's Choice – Effect of Physical Activity and Tobacco Use on Mortality and Morbidity in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease After Revascularisation: A Korean Nationwide Population Based Cohort Study
2022, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryTeam members influence retention in a First Peoples’ community-based weight-loss program
2022, Preventive Medicine ReportsThe effects of communicating cardiovascular disease risk as 'fitness age' on behavioral intentions and psychological outcomes
2021, Patient Education and CounselingEating and drinking gesture spotting and recognition using a novel adaptive segmentation technique and a gesture discrepancy measure
2020, Expert Systems with ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :First, the data entry process may result cumbersome, since questionnaires have to typically be filled manually by the subjects. Second, numerous studies indicate self-reported estimates of daily activities are subjective and variable (Rush, Valencia, & Plank, 2008; Smith, Marshall, & Huang, 2005). With reference to dietary behaviour, people tend to under-report their food consumption (Schoeller et al., 2013).
This study was funded by the Australian Department of Health and Ageing. Members of the research team who carried out the field work included Peter Ryan, Thea Kremser, and Monique Desmarchelier (Sydney); Belinda Houtgraaf (Brisbane); and Kate Singleton (Melbourne). Stewart Trost, MD (Kansas State University) wrote the software for analysis of the raw accelerometer data.
No financial conflict of interest was reported by the authors of this paper.