Research Article
Preventing Alcohol and Tobacco Exposed Pregnancies: CHOICES Plus in Primary Care

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.012Get rights and content

Introduction

Alcohol and tobacco use are common among U.S. women, yet if used during pregnancy these substances present significant preventable risks to prenatal and perinatal health. Because use of alcohol and tobacco often continue into the first trimester and beyond, especially among women with unintended pregnancies, effective evidence-based approaches are needed to decrease these risk behaviors. This study was designed to test the efficacy of CHOICES Plus, a preconception intervention for reducing the risk of alcohol- and tobacco-exposed pregnancies (AEPs and TEPs).

Study design

RCT with two intervention groups: CHOICES Plus (n=131) versus Brief Advice (n=130). Data collected April 2011 to October 2013. Data analysis finalized February 2016.

Setting/participants

Settings were 12 primary care clinics in a large Texas public healthcare system. Participants were women who were non-sterile, non-pregnant, aged 18–44 years, drinking more than three drinks per day or more than seven drinks per week, sexually active, and not using effective contraception (N=261). Forty-five percent were smokers.

Intervention

Interventions were two CHOICES Plus sessions and a contraceptive visit or Brief Advice and referral to community resources.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcomes were reduced risk of AEP and TEP through 9-month follow-up.

Results

In intention-to-treat analyses across 9 months, the CHOICES Plus group was more likely than the Brief Advice group to reduce risk of AEP with an incidence rate ratio of 0.620 (95% CI=0.511, 0.757) and absolute risk reduction of –0.233 (95% CI=–0.239, –0.226). CHOICES Plus group members at risk for both exposures were more likely to reduce TEP risk (incidence rate ratio, 0.597; 95% CI=0.424, 0.840 and absolute risk reduction, –0.233; 95% CI=–0.019, –0.521).

Conclusions

CHOICES Plus significantly reduced AEP and TEP risk. Addressing these commonly co-occurring risk factors in a single preconception program proved both feasible and efficacious in a low-income primary care population. Intervening with women before they become pregnant could shift the focus in clinical practice from treatment of substance-exposed pregnancies to prevention of a costly public health concern.

Trial registration

This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01032772.

Introduction

Alcohol and tobacco are among the most commonly used substances by women of childbearing age.1, 2 Alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs) are associated with a range of adverse birth outcomes, including observable facial and organ system anomalies, prenatal and postnatal growth impairment, and behavioral and developmental deficits. Even small amounts of alcohol during pregnancy may result in negative outcomes.3, 4 Tobacco-exposed pregnancies (TEPs) are associated with stillbirth and miscarriage, placenta previa, placental abruption, and preterm birth.5, 6 The infant mortality rate from a TEP is 40% higher than in non-TEP infants, and 23%–34% of deaths due to sudden infant death syndrome are attributable to a TEP.7, 8 The combined effects of alcohol and tobacco use during pregnancy are synergistic rather than additive, further increasing the risk of preterm labor, low birth weight, and growth restriction. Modification of either behavior can produce a large reduction in risk for an adverse fetal outcome.9

Nearly half of all U.S. pregnancies are unintended10 and the number may be even higher for alcohol11 and tobacco users.12 Many women not aware of their pregnancy continue drinking or smoking cigarettes well into their first and even second trimesters—critical periods of fetal susceptibility.13, 14

Although preconception health care has been a subject of inquiry since the mid-1980s,15 the importance of addressing preconception health behaviors, such as alcohol and tobacco use, has been increasingly emphasized in recent years.16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Additionally, although AEPs and TEPs are considered healthcare priorities by several major groups, including the National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) and the U.S. DHHS,16, 20 most intervention trials among women of childbearing age have focused on cessation during pregnancy,21, 22, 23 rather than in the preconception period.24, 25

Project CHOICES is an efficacious four-session intervention developed through a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–funded series of studies to prevent AEPs in various settings, including primary care.13, 26, 27 The CHOICES intervention uses motivational interviewing27, 28 and content aimed to increase participants’ motivation and commitment to change risky alcohol usea and ineffective contraceptiona together with a visit for contraception education and services. CHOICES Plus halves the number of sessions and adds tobacco as a target behavior, thus addressing the need for an efficacious bundle of preconception services in primary care settings where non-pregnant women of childbearing age are most likely to present for services when substance-exposed pregnancy is preventable. Women using alcohol and tobacco are more likely to seek general primary care than to present to alcohol treatment or smoking-cessation programs.29, 30 Thus, the current trial tested CHOICES Plus in a safety net healthcare system compared to Brief Advice and informational and referral brochures, using outcome measures and analytic methods similar to those used in the original CHOICES trial.

Section snippets

Study Sample

A two-group RCT with a minimal intervention control and 1:1 allocation to study conditions was conducted from April 2011 to October 2013. Data were collected in person at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months, and by telephone at 6 months. The telephone interview at 6 months was used in place of an in-person interview because of cost considerations and based on previous experience, to ensure a high retention rate.13

Eligible women:

  • 1.

    were aged 18–44 years;

  • 2.

    were not sterile (e.g., tubal ligation,

Results

Of 11,470 women screened, 4.9% were eligible, and 261 (46.7% consent rate) were randomized (Figure 1). Primary reasons for ineligibility included not drinking at risk levels (64.9%) and not being at risk of unintended pregnancy (27.7%). Follow-up continued until October 2013.

Trial participants had a mean age of 31 years, were largely Hispanic (47.1%) or non-Hispanic black (41.8%), with household incomes of <$20,000 (70.7%), and married/with a partner (40.6%). More than half (56.3%) were current

Discussion

The CHOICES Plus trial demonstrated the efficacy of a program to reduce risk for AEP and TEP among non-pregnant women at risk of unintended pregnancy attending safety net clinics in an intention-to-treat analyses at 9-month follow-up. In the complete case analyses, statistically significant decreases in the composite measures of risk for AEP and TEP were found at each time period. Reductions in risk drinking and increases in effective contraception for the CHOICES Plus women were comparable to

Conclusions

Given the promising outcomes, future research should focus on dissemination and translation issues related to its implementation, such as cost, training, and fidelity. An effectiveness trial is warranted in which existing clinic staff, rather than research staff, provides both screening and intervention services, without the influences on patient participation of compensation and study burden.

This two-session intervention significantly improved multiple risk behaviors that could cause AEP and

Acknowledgments

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01032772.

Drs. Mary M. Velasquez and Kirk von Sternberg had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Velasquez, von Sternberg, Floyd, Stephens, Seale, Dolan-Mullen. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting of the manuscript: all authors. Critical revision of the manuscript for important

References (64)

  • C.H. Tan et al.

    Alcohol use and binge drinking among women of childbearing age – United States, 2011-2013

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2015)
  • A. Jamal et al.

    Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2005-2014

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2015)
  • J.L. Jacobson et al.

    Drinking moderately and pregnancy. Effects on child development

    Alcohol Res Health

    (1999)
  • B. Sood et al.

    Prenatal alcohol exposure and childhood behavior at age 6 to 7 years: I. dose-response effect

    Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy – Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, United States, 40 sites, 2000-2010

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2013)
  • H.M. Salihu et al.

    Levels of excess infant deaths attributable to maternal smoking during pregnancy in the United States

    Matern Child Health J

    (2003)
  • P.M. Dietz et al.

    Infant morbidity and mortality attributable to prenatal smoking in the United States

    Obstet Gynecol Surv

    (2010)
  • H.J. Odendaal et al.

    Combined effects of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption on perinatal outcome

    Gynecol Obstet Invest

    (2009)
  • L.B. Finer et al.

    Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008

    Am J Public Health

    (2014)
  • T.S. Naimi et al.

    Binge drinking among U.S. adults

    JAMA

    (2003)
  • A.L. Stotts et al.

    Feasibility and efficacy of an intervention to reduce secondhand smoke exposure among infants discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit

    J Perinatol

    (2013)
  • D. Kanny et al.

    Vital signs: binge drinking among women and high school girls — United States, 2011

    MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep

    (2013)
  • Preventing Low Birthweight

    (1985)
  • K. Johnson et al.

    Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care--United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care

    MMWR Recomm Rep

    (2006)
  • Office of the Surgeon General. Advisory on alcohol use in pregnancy....
  • NIH Fact Sheets: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. NIH....
  • Healthy People 2020. Maternal, infant and child health: objectives. U.S. DHHS, Office of Disease Prevention and Health...
  • B.C. Stade et al.

    Psychological and/or educational interventions for reducing alcohol consumption in pregnant women and women planning pregnancy

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2009)
  • G. Chang et al.

    Brief intervention for alcohol use in pregnancy: a randomized trial

    Addiction

    (1999)
  • M.J. O’Connor et al.

    Brief intervention for alcohol use by pregnant women

    Am J Public Health

    (2007)
  • H.C. Olson et al.

    Responding to the challenge of early intervention for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders

    Infants Young Child

    (2007)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Facilitating treatment initiation and reproductive care postpartum to prevent substance-exposed pregnancies: A randomized bayesian pilot trial

      2022, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reduced Risk of a SEP. Women were at reduced risk of a SEP at F2 and F6 if they either used effective contraception or were completely abstinent from illicit substances on days in which vaginal intercourse was reported on the 30-day TimeLine FollowBack (TLFB) per previous studies on interventions to prevent risk of alcohol- and tobacco-exposed pregnancies (Floyd et al., 2007; Velasquez et al., 2017). Knowledge and Risk for HIV/HCV.

    • Unintended pregnancy prevention in women using psychoactive substances: A systematic review

      2020, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Only one study reported a consistent and significant effect of financial incentives on LARC use during a 6-month follow-up (g = 1.282–2.385, p < 0.05), but the effect on unintended pregnancy rate was comparable to usual practice (g = -1.196, p = 0.153) (Heil, Sigmon, Badger, Meyer, & Higgins, 2016). Three motivational interventions had a moderate but significant effect on adherence to regular contraceptive use at 3-month follow-up (Floyd et al., 2007; Rendall-Mkosi et al., 2013; Velasquez et al., 2017). The effect of motivational interventions on contraceptive use was quite stable and moderate (g ranged between 0.274 and 0.684, p < 0.05) at 6 and 9 months post-intervention (Floyd et al., 2007; Ingersoll, Ceperich, Hettema, Farrell-Carnahan, & Penberthy, 2013; Velasquez et al., 2017).

    • Changing multiple health risk behaviors in CHOICES

      2018, Preventive Medicine Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Like drinking, smoking is not only a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, but a behavior that is linked directly to negative birth outcomes (Sepinwall, 2002). Recent clinical trials have honed in on the need to prevent tobacco-exposed pregnancies alongside AEPs (Velasquez et al., 2017). The current study was guided by three research questions:

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text