Research ArticlePreventing Alcohol and Tobacco Exposed Pregnancies: CHOICES Plus in Primary Care
Introduction
Alcohol and tobacco are among the most commonly used substances by women of childbearing age.1, 2 Alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs) are associated with a range of adverse birth outcomes, including observable facial and organ system anomalies, prenatal and postnatal growth impairment, and behavioral and developmental deficits. Even small amounts of alcohol during pregnancy may result in negative outcomes.3, 4 Tobacco-exposed pregnancies (TEPs) are associated with stillbirth and miscarriage, placenta previa, placental abruption, and preterm birth.5, 6 The infant mortality rate from a TEP is 40% higher than in non-TEP infants, and 23%–34% of deaths due to sudden infant death syndrome are attributable to a TEP.7, 8 The combined effects of alcohol and tobacco use during pregnancy are synergistic rather than additive, further increasing the risk of preterm labor, low birth weight, and growth restriction. Modification of either behavior can produce a large reduction in risk for an adverse fetal outcome.9
Nearly half of all U.S. pregnancies are unintended10 and the number may be even higher for alcohol11 and tobacco users.12 Many women not aware of their pregnancy continue drinking or smoking cigarettes well into their first and even second trimesters—critical periods of fetal susceptibility.13, 14
Although preconception health care has been a subject of inquiry since the mid-1980s,15 the importance of addressing preconception health behaviors, such as alcohol and tobacco use, has been increasingly emphasized in recent years.16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Additionally, although AEPs and TEPs are considered healthcare priorities by several major groups, including the National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) and the U.S. DHHS,16, 20 most intervention trials among women of childbearing age have focused on cessation during pregnancy,21, 22, 23 rather than in the preconception period.24, 25
Project CHOICES is an efficacious four-session intervention developed through a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–funded series of studies to prevent AEPs in various settings, including primary care.13, 26, 27 The CHOICES intervention uses motivational interviewing27, 28 and content aimed to increase participants’ motivation and commitment to change risky alcohol usea and ineffective contraceptiona together with a visit for contraception education and services. CHOICES Plus halves the number of sessions and adds tobacco as a target behavior, thus addressing the need for an efficacious bundle of preconception services in primary care settings where non-pregnant women of childbearing age are most likely to present for services when substance-exposed pregnancy is preventable. Women using alcohol and tobacco are more likely to seek general primary care than to present to alcohol treatment or smoking-cessation programs.29, 30 Thus, the current trial tested CHOICES Plus in a safety net healthcare system compared to Brief Advice and informational and referral brochures, using outcome measures and analytic methods similar to those used in the original CHOICES trial.
Section snippets
Study Sample
A two-group RCT with a minimal intervention control and 1:1 allocation to study conditions was conducted from April 2011 to October 2013. Data were collected in person at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months, and by telephone at 6 months. The telephone interview at 6 months was used in place of an in-person interview because of cost considerations and based on previous experience, to ensure a high retention rate.13
Eligible women:
- 1.
were aged 18–44 years;
- 2.
were not sterile (e.g., tubal ligation,
Results
Of 11,470 women screened, 4.9% were eligible, and 261 (46.7% consent rate) were randomized (Figure 1). Primary reasons for ineligibility included not drinking at risk levels (64.9%) and not being at risk of unintended pregnancy (27.7%). Follow-up continued until October 2013.
Trial participants had a mean age of 31 years, were largely Hispanic (47.1%) or non-Hispanic black (41.8%), with household incomes of <$20,000 (70.7%), and married/with a partner (40.6%). More than half (56.3%) were current
Discussion
The CHOICES Plus trial demonstrated the efficacy of a program to reduce risk for AEP and TEP among non-pregnant women at risk of unintended pregnancy attending safety net clinics in an intention-to-treat analyses at 9-month follow-up. In the complete case analyses, statistically significant decreases in the composite measures of risk for AEP and TEP were found at each time period. Reductions in risk drinking and increases in effective contraception for the CHOICES Plus women were comparable to
Conclusions
Given the promising outcomes, future research should focus on dissemination and translation issues related to its implementation, such as cost, training, and fidelity. An effectiveness trial is warranted in which existing clinic staff, rather than research staff, provides both screening and intervention services, without the influences on patient participation of compensation and study burden.
This two-session intervention significantly improved multiple risk behaviors that could cause AEP and
Acknowledgments
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01032772.
Drs. Mary M. Velasquez and Kirk von Sternberg had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Velasquez, von Sternberg, Floyd, Stephens, Seale, Dolan-Mullen. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting of the manuscript: all authors. Critical revision of the manuscript for important
References (64)
- et al.
Effects of smoking during pregnancy. Five meta-analyses
Am J Prev Med
(1999) - et al.
Preventing alcohol-exposed pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial
Am J Prev Med
(2007) - et al.
Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: comparison at intake and 6 months later
Drug Alcohol Depend
(2009) - et al.
Stages of change profiles in outpatient alcoholism treatment
J Subst Abuse
(1990) - et al.
A comparison of a brief and long version of the Situational Confidence Questionnaire
Behav Res Ther
(2000) - et al.
Trends in U.S. past-year marijuana use from 1985 to 2009: an age–period–cohort analysis
Drug Alcohol Depend
(2012) - et al.
Marijuana impairs growth in mid-gestation fetuses
Neurotoxicol Teratol
(2005) - et al.
Prenatal marijuana and alcohol exposure and academic achievement at age 10
Neurotoxicol Teratol
(2004) - et al.
The effects of prenatal marijuana exposure on delinquent behaviors are mediated by measures of neurocognitive functioning
Neurotoxicol Teratol
(2011) - et al.
Using the Timeline Followback to determine time windows representative of annual alcohol consumption with problem drinkers
Addict Behav
(2008)
Alcohol use and binge drinking among women of childbearing age – United States, 2011-2013
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2005-2014
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Drinking moderately and pregnancy. Effects on child development
Alcohol Res Health
Prenatal alcohol exposure and childhood behavior at age 6 to 7 years: I. dose-response effect
Pediatrics
Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy – Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, United States, 40 sites, 2000-2010
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Levels of excess infant deaths attributable to maternal smoking during pregnancy in the United States
Matern Child Health J
Infant morbidity and mortality attributable to prenatal smoking in the United States
Obstet Gynecol Surv
Combined effects of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption on perinatal outcome
Gynecol Obstet Invest
Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008
Am J Public Health
Binge drinking among U.S. adults
JAMA
Feasibility and efficacy of an intervention to reduce secondhand smoke exposure among infants discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit
J Perinatol
Vital signs: binge drinking among women and high school girls — United States, 2011
MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep
Preventing Low Birthweight
Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care--United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care
MMWR Recomm Rep
Psychological and/or educational interventions for reducing alcohol consumption in pregnant women and women planning pregnancy
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Brief intervention for alcohol use in pregnancy: a randomized trial
Addiction
Brief intervention for alcohol use by pregnant women
Am J Public Health
Responding to the challenge of early intervention for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
Infants Young Child
Cited by (24)
Maternal incarceration and adolescent girls’ risk of substance-exposed pregnancy, STIs, and HIV
2023, Children and Youth Services ReviewFacilitating treatment initiation and reproductive care postpartum to prevent substance-exposed pregnancies: A randomized bayesian pilot trial
2022, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Reduced Risk of a SEP. Women were at reduced risk of a SEP at F2 and F6 if they either used effective contraception or were completely abstinent from illicit substances on days in which vaginal intercourse was reported on the 30-day TimeLine FollowBack (TLFB) per previous studies on interventions to prevent risk of alcohol- and tobacco-exposed pregnancies (Floyd et al., 2007; Velasquez et al., 2017). Knowledge and Risk for HIV/HCV.
Unintended pregnancy prevention in women using psychoactive substances: A systematic review
2020, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Only one study reported a consistent and significant effect of financial incentives on LARC use during a 6-month follow-up (g = 1.282–2.385, p < 0.05), but the effect on unintended pregnancy rate was comparable to usual practice (g = -1.196, p = 0.153) (Heil, Sigmon, Badger, Meyer, & Higgins, 2016). Three motivational interventions had a moderate but significant effect on adherence to regular contraceptive use at 3-month follow-up (Floyd et al., 2007; Rendall-Mkosi et al., 2013; Velasquez et al., 2017). The effect of motivational interventions on contraceptive use was quite stable and moderate (g ranged between 0.274 and 0.684, p < 0.05) at 6 and 9 months post-intervention (Floyd et al., 2007; Ingersoll, Ceperich, Hettema, Farrell-Carnahan, & Penberthy, 2013; Velasquez et al., 2017).
Changing multiple health risk behaviors in CHOICES
2018, Preventive Medicine ReportsCitation Excerpt :Like drinking, smoking is not only a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, but a behavior that is linked directly to negative birth outcomes (Sepinwall, 2002). Recent clinical trials have honed in on the need to prevent tobacco-exposed pregnancies alongside AEPs (Velasquez et al., 2017). The current study was guided by three research questions:
Prevalence of alcohol use in pregnant women with substance use disorder
2018, Drug and Alcohol DependenceIndependent and Combined Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Prenatal Stress on Fetal HPA Axis Development
2024, International Journal of Molecular Sciences