Preferences for involvement in treatment decision making of patients with cancer: A review of the literature
Introduction
Health and social care policy promotes the agenda of involvement by encouraging patients, careers and members of the public to adopt a greater level of responsibility for and participation in health care, including, playing a much greater role in decisions affecting their own treatment and care (Department of Health, 2003). Medical ethics has emphasised the right of patients to be fully informed and to participate in treatment decision making, which is legislated for in some countries (Guadagnoli and Ward, 1998). The recent emphasis on patient involvement and autonomy in health care settings is indicative of efforts to promote a move away from a paternalistic form of care towards one of partnership between the medical profession and patients. This, in turn, reflects wider cultural tendencies that position patients as active consumers and citizens involved in making health care decisions.
There is a wealth of evidence related to treatment decision making for patients with cancer. This includes a significant amount of research about the use of decision aids (Caress, 2000) to facilitate decision making, but also a small but growing amount of literature related to other aspects of treatment decision making including research about the influence of patient involvement in treatment decision making on quality of life (Andersen and Urban, 1999), the impact of the media on treatment decision making (Passalacqu et al., 2004), the relationship of depression and anxiety to treatment decision making (Petersen et al., 2003), how married couples interact in reaching a treatment decision (Boehmer and Clark, 2001), patients’ attitudes towards different treatment options (Brundage et al., 2001), decisional regret (Davison and Goldenberg, 2003), decision making in palliative care treatment (De Haes and Koedoot, 2003) and preferences for different types of treatment (Soloman et al., 2003).
Researchers have also investigated patients’ preferences for involvement in treatment decision making. Establishing preferences for involvement in treatment decision making is important if the aim is to make health care more sensitive to the needs and expectations of each individual patient. Since patients are not a homogenous group, it cannot be assumed that they will all want to play an active or collaborative role in making decisions about their care. Thus, a shared decision-making process with doctors and patients involved in treatment decision making may be too simplistic of a model. This is why the process of health care professionals systematically finding out about patient preferences in relation to involvement in treatment decision making is seen as crucial.
As part of a larger systematic review of literature about the agenda of involvement in cancer care, a review of research about patients’ preferences for involvement in treatment decision making was conducted (Hubbard et al., 2007). The review aimed to improve understanding of the role that patients with cancer want in relation to their treatment decision making, socio-demographic factors that influence role preference, the degree of congruence between patients’ preferred and actual roles in treatment decision making, and the impact of role preferences on outcomes, such as patient satisfaction.
Section snippets
Type of review
This review was carried out using systematic methods to produce a narrative summary. We used systematic methods to search for literature, applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, appraised the quality of studies included, selected relevant data from the included studies for analysis and provided a narrative summary of these data.
Searching for literature
All database searches ran from 1994 to 2004 inclusive. No language, geographical or methodological limits, was imposed on the results. The majority of hits were
Results
A total of 31 papers were included (26 from electronic database searches and 5 from cited references or journal searches), all of which received the highest quality appraisal rating. No literature reviews were found, thus all papers included in the review are research studies. Table 1 summarises the method employed, sample chosen and the key findings for each paper.
Methodological concerns
Despite the growing abundance of research in relation to preferences for involvement in treatment decision making amongst patients with cancer, there are a number of methodological limitations of this body of work worth noting. In particular, generalising from the 31 studies included in this review is problematic because of small sample sizes, the inability to decipher from reading these papers whether or not the sample is representative of a wider population and the wide variation in the
Conclusions
Changes in societal attitudes towards patient involvement in treatment decision making coupled with a much more consumerist and citizenship approach to health care is likely to affect medical practice. Those recommending increasing involvement of patients in treatment decision making have asserted that most patients prefer a collaborative role and that this leads to improved satisfaction with the consultation and decision-making process. Yet, this assertion is not confirmed by most of the
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgement
The authors of this paper would like to thank Dr. Carol Bugge for her comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
References (48)
- et al.
Cancer patients’ attitudes toward treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: implications for patient education and decision support
Patient Education and Counseling
(2001) - et al.
The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support
Annals of Oncology
(1997) - et al.
Patient centred decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a world of paradoxes
Patient Education and Counseling
(2003) - et al.
Decision making during a serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
(1992) - et al.
Sharing decisions in cancer care
Social Science & Medicine
(2001) - et al.
Patient participation in decision making
Social Science & Medicine
(1998) - et al.
Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis
Social Science & Medicine
(1994) - et al.
The seriously ill hospitalised patient: preferred role in end of life decision making?
Journal of Critical Care
(2003) - et al.
A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice
Patient Education and Counseling
(2007) - et al.
Preferences for participation in treatment decision making and information needs of parents of children with cancer: a pilot study
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
(1999)
Treatment decisions in palliative cancer care: patients’ preferences for involvement and doctors’ knowledge about it
European Journal of Cancer
Men with prostate cancer: influence of psychosocial factors on informational needs and decision making
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Involvement in decision-making and breast cancer survivor quality of life
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Nature of decision making in the terminally ill patient
Cancer Nursing
Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer
Cancer Nursing
Decision making role preferences and information needs: a comparison of colorectal and breast cancer
Health Expectations
Attitudes of oncologists, oncology nurses and patients from a women's clinic regarding medical decision making with older and younger breast cancer patients
Gerontologist
Information needs, sources of information and decisional roles in women with breast cancer
Oncology Nursing Forum
Married couples’ perspectives on prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment decision making
Psycho-Oncology
Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions
Cancer
Review: health care decision aids improve knowledge, decrease decisional conflict and increase active participation
Evidence Based Nursing
Information and participation preferences among cancer patients
Annals of Internal Medicine
Cited by (126)
Physician awareness of patients’ preferred level of involvement in decision-making at the initial urogynecology visit: a randomized trial
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyInformation needs across time after a hematological cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of patient and clinician perspectives
2023, Patient Education and Counseling‘My doctor should decide’ – Predictors for healthcare users’ stated preferences regarding medical decision-making
2023, Patient Education and CounselingVirtual reality as a patient education tool in healthcare: A scoping review
2022, Patient Education and CounselingPerceived problems with involvement in decision making about breast cancer treatment and care: A cross-sectional study
2021, Patient Education and Counseling