Acute otitis media in young children – What do parents say?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.030Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

The Ear infections Attitudes Research study investigated parental attitudes and awareness towards acute otitis media (AOM) and evaluated the burden of AOM for affected children, their families, and parental work capabilities.

Methods

This study, conducted via online interviews in October–November 2010, included parents (N = 2867) from 12 countries, whose children aged ≤3.5 years had experienced ≥1 professionally diagnosed AOM episode in the last 6 months (AOM-experienced group; N = 1438) or had never experienced any professionally diagnosed AOM episode (non AOM-experienced group; N = 1429). The interviews consisted of questions with multiple-choice, five-point scaled or free-text answers. Answers to multiple-choice questions were presented as frequencies of particular responses and those to scaled questions as mean values or percentages of parents considering each aspect as applicable.

Results

Parents considered that the main AOM burdens for affected children were pain (mean values on five-point scales: 4.4 and 4.5), disturbed sleep (4.3 and 4.3) and irritability (4.2 and 4.0) and for their families, sleepless nights (4.2 and 3.8) and worries about the child's recovery (4.1 and 4.3) and about potential long-term implications (4.0 and 4.3) in the AOM-experienced and non AOM-experienced groups, respectively. During their child's most recent AOM episode, 95% of parents in the AOM-experienced group used antibiotics, 76% reported that their doctors prescribed antibiotics for immediate use, 13% were advised to return for antibiotic prescription if symptoms did not abate and 9% received a prescription for antibiotics to use if symptoms did not improve. Both reported prescription and usage rates for antibiotics were higher than expected. When their child had AOM, 73% of parents had to be absent from work or rearrange their working hours. Among those who took leave from work, 67% stayed at home for 2–7 days.

Conclusions

Parents perceive AOM to be a burden for their child and families, particularly the pain and disturbed sleep due to AOM, and this disease had a significant effect on parents’ ability to attend work. Given how common AOM is, this loss of workdays may lead to substantial financial burden for families and the society. Antibiotics were almost invariably used in all countries despite current guidelines.

Introduction

Most episodes of acute otitis media (AOM) in children are caused by bacteria, of which the three most frequently identified are Streptococcus pneumoniae, non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. AOM is one of the most frequent bacterial infections for which medical advice is sought and represents the most common reason for antibiotic prescription in children younger than five years of age [2], [7]. Guidelines on the clinical management of AOM in children have been developed and various countries recommend a “watch-and-wait” policy before starting treatment of AOM with antibiotics, but adherence to these guidelines is poor and early and frequent use of antibiotics continues [1], [3], [8], [9], [10], [11].

Currently, the knowledge of parents’ perceptions and attitudes regarding AOM is limited and additional studies are needed to better understand the situation of children with this disease and to determine priorities in targeting educational interventions. In previous studies, parents reported that AOM had an important burden on the affected child, themselves and their family and that this disease resulted in substantial use of medical services and loss of workdays [12], [13]. However, parental knowledge about AOM may be inaccurate; parents seem to underestimate the actual risk of their child experiencing an AOM episode and the majority of parents consider that antibiotics are always useful to treat this disease [14], [15]. Here, we present the results of the Ear infections Attitudes Research (EAR) survey, which is the largest study that has currently been conducted on a global level to investigate parental attitudes and awareness towards AOM in young children.

Section snippets

Study design

The EAR study was conducted in October and November 2010 via online interviews by the Health division of GfK SE, Germany, which is a global independent market research company. The survey was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and was overseen by a multi-disciplinary steering committee, the Global Otitis Media Prevention Panel, which provided independent and multi-disciplinary guidance and perspective on the survey design. The research included respondents from 12 countries across the

Survey population

The survey included responses from 2867 parents; 1438 in the AOM-experienced group and 1429 in the non AOM-experienced group (Table 1). There were approximately 250 respondents from each country, except from the Philippines where 100 questionnaires were completed.

The mean age of the children who had experienced an episode of AOM was 21.8 ± 8.9 months. Parents in the AOM-experienced group reported that their child/children under three and a half years old had suffered on average 1.5 professionally

Burden of AOM

The EAR study directly consulted almost 3000 parents from around the world about the impact that AOM had on their child, themselves, and their family. Parents whose children had experienced AOM in the last six months (N = 1438) considered that the main burdens of this disease for the affected child were pain, disturbed sleep and irritability, which is consistent with previous observations [13], [16]. These results support the important role of symptomatic drugs (e.g. analgesics) for the treatment

Conflict of interest

The institution of SI received money from GlaxoSmithKline group of companies for conducting and analysing the survey. AV and CB declare that they received payment for advisory board membership and meeting attendance from GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. HC declares he received payment for consultancy and meeting attendance from GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.

Authors’ contributions

SI was involved in the plan, design, and review of the reported study, the collection of the data, the interpretation of the results, and the coordination of the study. AV participated to the study design and the interpretation of the data. HC was involved in the review of the reported study and the interpretation and comments on the results. CB was involved in the plan design and review of the reported study and the interpretation of the data.

Funding source

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA was the funding source and was involved in all stages of the study conduct and analysis. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA also funded all costs associated with the development and the publishing of the present manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the parents who participated in the study and the members of the Global Otitis Media Prevention Panel for their contribution to the survey. We thank Claire Verbelen (XPE Pharma & Science) for scientific writing support and Bart van Heertum (XPE Pharma & Science c/o GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) for editorial support and manuscript coordination.

References (27)

  • J.O. Klein et al.

    Clin. Infect. Dis.

    (1994)
  • P. Little

    Delayed prescribing—a sensible approach to the management of acute otitis media

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • NSW Department of Health

    Children and Infants with Otitis media – Acute management

    (2004)
  • Cited by (51)

    • A study of knowledge, attitude and practices about otitis media in parents in Navi-Mumbai

      2021, Journal of Otology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The parental perceptions about the quality of health services at health facilities are outlined in Fig. 4. This study shows acceptable levels of parental knowledge about otitis media and is in agreement with similar studies (Mukara KB et al., 2017; Srikanth et al., 2009; Barber et al., 2014). While 77% knew about one or more causes of otitis media, only 54.5% of respondents could name two or more symptoms of ear infections.

    • Parent information needs and experience regarding acute otitis media in children: A systematic review

      2021, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fifteen studies (10 quantitative; 5 qualitative) examined parents’ knowledge and attitudes about AOM treatment. These studies reflected a general tendency for parents to consider antibiotics the best treatment for AOM [12,13,29–31,33,34,36–39,41–44]. Misconceptions and knowledge deficits regarding antibiotics for AOM were also common themes (n = 15).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text