International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Clinical investigationImpact of radiation oncology practice on pain: A cross-sectional survey
Introduction
Pain is a common symptom in cancer patients, affecting about 55% of patients (1). Many studies have shown that pain is often undertreated with available analgesics no matter which country is considered 2, 3, 4, 5. Numerous factors can compromise good application of national or international guidelines for treating patients with pain. Barriers can be related to the patient's reluctance to discuss the pain, a lack of physician knowledge and training, or particular practices such as outpatient treatment. In addition, national constraints on the use of opioids are often ambiguous, and differences between legitimate and illegitimate opioid use can also influence a physician's practices. Studies from France have pointed out a similar situation (6), and, until 1998, the severity of French laws concerning the use of opioids meant that France was a country with a low national consumption of morphine (7). In 1998, a triennial government plan against pain was begun to provide better comprehensive patient management. Four areas were defined: taking into account the patients' requests, developing specific structures in hospitals for fighting against pain, caregiver training and information on pain evaluation and treatment, and public information. By March 2003, the government announced a new cancer plan that reinforced these health policy orientations (8).
At the hospital level, these measures were implemented by creating committees for pain prevention (French acronym, CLUD). In addition, a memorandum was published that encouraged training for paramedical staff in pain assessment and gave them the possibility to initiate treatment when necessary. However, these actions developed for managing cancer pain remained more related to patients hospitalized in medical oncology departments. In addition to the pain due to disease itself, radiotherapy (RT) can induce or alter preexistent pain because of treatment manipulations under megavoltage units and daily transportation or waiting time. In addition, the acute toxicity of RT generates significant pain, and chronic post-RT syndromes such as plexopathy can occur. These points are generally not mentioned in studies about outpatient oncology practice, which are more concerned with medical oncology practices 4, 5, 9.
To appreciate the impact of radiation oncology practice on pain, a cross-sectional study was performed in our department. The aim was to evaluate the factors that can alter the management of pain and modify patients' quality of life and how these issues were dealt with in our department. To our knowledge, this is the first patient-centered study specifically aimed at the management of pain in a RT department.
Section snippets
Methods and materials
A 1-day cross-sectional survey was conducted in our radiotherapy-oncology department. A questionnaire was given to all patients treated on the same day, except for 2 children who were excluded from the study. RT technologists gave a questionnaire to a total of 126 treated patients with the request that it be filled out during the waiting time for the treatment session. When patients were unable to complete the questionnaire right away, the technologists were available to collect it the next
Results
A total of 126 patients were asked to participate in the study. Of these, 33 patients declined. They found the study too troublesome (n = 6), did not understand it because of language difficulties (n = 3), were not motivated (n = 14), were too ill (n = 7), or began RT the day of study (n = 3). The mean age was statistically similar between the two groups, and tumor location was significantly different (p <0.01). The characteristics of the 93 remaining patients (73.87%) are presented in Table 1.
Discussion
A significant number of cancer patients experience pain at diagnosis or when the disease is progressing. Many studies have attempted to evaluate the proportion of patients concerned but with wide discrepancies between results. However, pain is a real problem that has been recognized by the World Health Organization (12) as adversely affecting patients' quality of life. About 30% of newly diagnosed patients and 65–95% of patients during the course of the illness will be concerned with the
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the following radiotherapy technologists and nurses who participated to the study: Martine Boureille, Céline Chambon, Emmanuelle Cosme, Valérie Frauciel, Gisèle Galaup, Marie-Christine Glin, Josette Liebens, Chantal Manceau, Raymonde Mélanie, Aurélie Millo, Emmeline Motyl, Christiane Piras, Marie-Ange Rabou, Nathalie Thauvin, Stéphanie Tosello, and Joëlle Verhoven.
References (30)
- et al.
A Quebec survey of issues in cancer pain management
J Pain Symptom Manag
(2002) - et al.
Barriers to effective cancer pain managementA survey of hospitalized cancer patients in Australia
J Pain Symptom Manag
(2002) - et al.
Pain control in ambulatory patients—Can we do better?
J Pain Symptom Manag
(2003) - et al.
Prospective patient-based assessment of effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases
Radiother Oncol
(2001) - et al.
A short radiotherapy course for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Effective palliation and patients' convenience
Lung Cancer
(2002) - et al.
Mucositis incidence, severity and associated outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapyA systematic literature review
Radiother Oncol
(2003) - et al.
Predictors of radiation-induced esophageal toxicity in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003) - et al.
Cancer pain management by radiotherapistsA survey of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group physicians
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2000) - et al.
An audit of travel and waiting times for outpatient radiotherapy
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
(1992) - et al.
Waiting for radiotherapy in Ontario
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1994)