Original Article
General Practitioner Awareness of Preferred Place of Death and Correlates of Dying in a Preferred Place: A Nationwide Mortality Follow-Back Study in The Netherlands

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.12.007Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

To improve the quality of end-of-life care, general practitioner (GP) awareness of where their patients prefer to die is important. To examine GP awareness of patients' preferred place of death (POD), associated patient- and care-related characteristics, and the congruence between preferred and actual POD in The Netherlands, a mortality follow-back study was conducted between January 2005 and December 2006. Standardized registration forms were used to collect data on all nonsudden deaths (n = 637) by means of the Dutch Sentinel Network, a nationally representative network of general practices. Forty-six percent of patients had GPs who were not aware of their preferred POD. Of those whose GPs were aware, 88% had preferred to die in a private or care home, 10% in a hospice or palliative care unit, and 2% in a hospital. GPs were informed by the patients themselves in 84% of cases. Having financial status “above average,” a life-prolongation or palliative care goal, and using specialist palliative care services were associated with higher GP-awareness odds. Four-fifth of patients with known preferred POD died there. There is a potential for improving GP awareness of patients' preferred POD. Such awareness is enhanced when palliation is an active part of end-of-life care. The hospital is the POD least preferred by dying patients.

Key Words

General practitioner awareness
GP
Sentinel Network
place of death
end-of-life care
The Netherlands

Cited by (0)

The Dutch SENTI-MELC research group was supported by the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders as a strategic basic research project (contract SBO IWT 050158: 2006-2010), in “Monitoring the Quality of End-of-Life Care (MELC).” It is a collaboration between the Vrije University Medical Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Gent University, and Antwerp University.

The Fund for Scientific Research did not play any role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in the preparation, review, or approval of this manuscript.

None of the authors had any potential conflicts of interest.