Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 67, Issue 10, November 2008, Pages 1481-1491
Social Science & Medicine

When there is no doctor: Reasons for the disappearance of primary care physicians in the US during the early 21st century

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.034Get rights and content

Abstract

Primary care doctoring in the USA today (2007) bears little resemblance to what existed just 25 years ago. We focus on what is likely to unfold in the U.S. over the next several decades and suggest that by about 2025, primary care doctoring in the U.S. could be rare, possibly unrecognizable and even nonexistent.

Seven reasons for the probable disappearance of primary care doctoring are identified. The most important reason is medicine's loss of state sponsorship: the U.S. state has shifted from a pluralistic orientation to a New Right approach. With less state protection medicine has become even more attractive for private interests.

Six additional reasons include: (1) the epidemiologic transition (chronic diseases reduce doctors to a palliative role and monitoring of incurable conditions); (2) the overcrowded health care playing field (non-physician clinicians are supplanting primary care doctors); (3) the unintended consequences of clinical guidelines (the art of doctoring is reduced to formulaic tasks, easily codified and performed by non-physician clinicians); (4) the demise of the in-person examination (in-person examination is being replaced by impersonal testing); (5) primary care doctoring is becoming unattractive (physicians are dissatisfied, alienated and experiencing income declines. Applications by U.S. graduates to primary care programs continue to decline); (6) patients are not what they used to be (Internet access and Direct to Consumer advertising are changing the doctor–patient relationship).

By 2025, many everyday illnesses in the U.S. will be managed via the Internet or by non-physician clinicians working out of retail clinics. Some medical problems will still require a physician's attention, but this will be provided by specialists rather than by primary care doctors (general practitioners).

Introduction

Doctoring today bears little resemblance to the work of “the” profession just 25 years ago. The medical profession reached its zenith around the middle of the 20th century, the so-called “golden age of doctoring,” when it was the dominant profession. Different reasons have been offered for this historic dominance (Carr-Saunders and Wilson, 1933, Freidson, 1970a, Freidson, 1970b, Larson, 1977, Parsons, 1951, Torstendahl and Burrage, 1990, Turner, 1984) and these are the subject of continuing debate (Johnson, 1972, Krause, 1999, McKinlay, 1977, McKinlay and Arches, 1985, Parkin, 1974). The last quarter of the 20th century witnessed what was for Starr (1982) “the social transformation of medicine,” and for others, “the end of the golden age of doctoring” (McKinlay & Marceau, 2002). Few anticipated the magnitude of the unfolding transformation and most appear surprised by the rapidity with which it occurred. The seismic changes in doctoring are reflected in popular TV programs—Marcus Welby MD began as a community-based solo practitioner, transitioned to hospital practice and is replaced today by shows like ER, House, and Grey's Anatomy. In the UK the autonomous personal practice of the 1960s, reflected in a program like Dr Finlay's Casebook, is now unrecognizable in programs like Green Wing.

Sociological analyses of modern doctoring focus on the present and/or the recent past—they either: (a) describe what is presently happening to medicine/doctoring (the demise of professionalism, corporatization, encroachments on clinical autonomy, the emergence of competing health workers, and the erosion of the doctor–patient relationship); or (b) they offer competing theoretical reasons for the dramatic changes that have already occurred (Hafferty and Light, 1995, Light, 1993, McKinlay and Marceau, 2002). This paper takes an entirely different approach: rather than focus on what has already occurred we speculate on the likely future of primary care doctoring in the U.S. by the year 2025 (Davis et al., 2005, Frist, 2005). By that time we expect most primary care physicians in the U.S. will have disappeared from the medical care scene. Our goal is to explain why this will have occurred. Just as doctoring at the turn of the 20th century was unlike anything that existed just 25 years earlier, so too will medicine by 2025 bear little resemblance to what exists today. Indeed, the transformation during the next several decades could be more remarkable than what occurred over the past 25 years (Nettleton & Hanlon, 2006). This paper contemplates the unimaginable—a time, in the not too distant future, when there are few remaining primary care doctors. The reasons why this will happen are the subject of this paper.

Section snippets

The 21st century state has other interests

The State had a powerful role in the rise of medicine to its position of professional dominance during the 20th century (Alford, 1975). Government agencies served a legitimating function for physician activities, accorded physicians a monopolistic position and privileged status, and served as a guarantor of high physician income (through programs like Medicaid and Medicare). Through political and legal means the State advanced physician interests beyond almost all others and disposed of

Doctoring and the epidemiologic transition

As societies develop economically, their patterns of morbidity and mortality also undergo considerable change. Earlier stages of economic development are characterized by high death rates, especially among the young and mainly due to acute infectious diseases. In more economically developed societies there is a greater risk of death among older individuals, mainly due to chronic degenerative diseases. This shift, from infectious to long-term chronic diseases, has been termed “the epidemiologic

The overcrowded health care playing field

Physicians had the medical playing field to themselves for most of the 20th century but the number of non-physician clinicians has increased dramatically and they are becoming responsible for increasing amounts of the medical care that was previously provided almost exclusively by physicians (Cooper et al., 1998, Cooper and Stoflet, 1996, Safriet, 1994, Starr, 1982). With increasing numbers and organizational support for their position, non-physician clinicians appear to be using the strategies

Unintended consequences of clinical guidelines

Health care variations have been the subject of research for many decades, but interest increased rapidly during the 1980s and 1990s. Clinical or practice guidelines were considered one promising means of reducing worrisome socio-economic disparities (both in the receipt of health care and health status). Well-intentioned quality assurance specialists and professional organizations developed lists (guidelines) of minimally sufficient actions that ought to be taken by any competent medical

Demise of physical exam

Obtaining a detailed medical history and conducting an in-person physical examination have been long considered indispensable components of everyday primary medical care. A physician performs between 160,000 and 300,000 interviews during a lifetime of practice (Lipkin, 1996). Some medical schools require students to take courses on “the interview” or “the medical encounter”, which emphasize development of careful listening and empathic skills. Along with presentations of bodily complaints

Primary care is increasingly unattractive work

Surveys of doctors across countries with very different health care systems, consistently report high levels of dissatisfaction with the content of their work, and frustration with the ever-changing medical workplace (Mechanic, 2003). Numerous reports of physician discontent have appeared in major medical journals over the past decade at least (Bodenheimer et al., 1999, Grumbach, 1999, Kassirer, 1998, Mechanic, 2003, More and Showstack, 2003, Showstack et al., 2003, Williams et al., 2002). Very

Rise of a new breed of patients

Towards the end of the 20th century there was a perceptible shift in the balance of power in the doctor–patient relationship. Sensing that changes were occurring, Reeder and Berkanovic (1973) first employed the term “consumer” to describe a patient and reflected on the changing professional–client relationship. Haug (1973) discussed “the revolt of the client” and “the obsolescence of the concept of professionalism”. Lazare et al. (1975) also recognized profound changes were occurring and

Summary and implications

Doctoring today (2007/2008) bears little resemblance to what existed just 25 years ago. Medicine's rise to dominance during the mid-20th century and its precipitate decline by the 21st century are described elsewhere (McKinlay & Marceau, 2002). This paper shifts the focus from unresolvable theoretical debates over what has already occurred to what is likely to unfold over the next several decades and provides various reasons for it. Given the transformation of doctoring now occurring, it would

Acknowledgements

Our appreciation to John Stoeckle (Harvard Medical School), Richard Johannes (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston), Rudolph Klein (London School of Economics), Richard Grant (Massachusetts General Hospital), and David Mechanic (Rutgers University) for helpful input on earlier drafts. They obviously bear no responsibility for the views expressed herein.

References (135)

  • American College of Physicians (January 30, 2006). The impending collapse of primary care medicine and its implications...
  • Ashwin

    Overseas junior doctors warned to expect unemployment in the UK

    BMJ

    (2005)
  • C. Bambra et al.

    Towards a politics of health

    Health Promotion International

    (2005)
  • P.M. Barnes et al.

    Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002

    Advance Data

    (2004)
  • T. Becker

    Real-time testing for PKU

    (2004)
  • S. Belman et al.

    An assessment of pediatric after-hours telephone care: a 1-year experience

    Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

    (2005)
  • T. Bodenheimer

    Primary care – will it survive?

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (2006)
  • T. Bodenheimer et al.

    Primary care physicians should be coordinators, not gatekeepers

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1999)
  • J.R. Boulet et al.

    The international medical graduate pipeline: recent trends in certification and residency training

    Health Affairs (Millwood, VA)

    (2006)
  • M. Brodie

    Understanding the effects of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising

    (November 2001)
  • J.P. Bunker

    Medicine matters after all: Measuring the benefits of medical care, a healthy lifestyle, and a just social environment

    (2001)
  • S. Cant et al.

    A new medical pluralism: Complementary medicine

    (1999)
  • A.M. Carr-Saunders et al.

    The professions

    (1933)
  • J. Carvel

    Two thirds of doctors say that medicine is a bad career choice

    The Guardian

    (27 April 2007)
  • B.G. Charlton

    Restoring the balance: evidence-based medicine put in its place

    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    (1997)
  • M.B. Clarke

    Debating a doctor deficit

    Proto

    (2007)
  • Clinton, W. J., President (January 23, 1996). State of the Union Address. U.S....
  • R.A. Cooper et al.

    Current and projected workforce of nonphysician clinicians

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1998)
  • R.A. Cooper et al.

    Trends in the education and practice of alternative medicine clinicians

    Health Affairs (Millwood, VA)

    (1996)
  • I.D. Coulter et al.

    The rise and rise of complementary and alternative medicine: a sociological perspective

    Medical Journal of Australia (Sydney)

    (2004)
  • N. Craig et al.

    Does health care improve health?

    Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

    (2006)
  • R. Crawford

    You are dangerous to your health: the ideology and politics of victim blaming

    International Journal of Health Services

    (1977)
  • D.M. Cutler et al.

    Changes in the age distribution of mortality over the 20th century

    (2001)
  • K. Davis et al.

    A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    (2005)
  • A. D'Crus et al.

    Reasons for choosing and complying with complementary health care: an in-house study on a South Australian clinic

    Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine

    (December 2005)
  • R.A. Dudley et al.

    Assessing the relationship between quality of care and the characteristics of health care organizations

    Medical Care Research & Review

    (2000)
  • D.M. Eisenberg et al.

    Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1998)
  • A.M. Epstein et al.

    Paying physicians for high quality care

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (2004)
  • S.L. Ettner et al.

    An alternative approach to reducing the costs of patient care? A controlled trial of the multi-disciplinary doctor–nurse practitioner (MDNP) model

    Medical Decision Making

    (2006)
  • E. Freidson

    Client control and medical practice

    American Journal of Sociology

    (1960)
  • E. Freidson

    Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge

    (1970)
  • E. Freidson

    Professional dominance: The social structure of medical care

    (1970)
  • E. Freidson

    Prepaid group practice and the new “demanding patient”

    Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Health & Society

    (1973)
  • E. Freidson

    Professionalism reborn: Theory policy and practice

    (1994)
  • M. Freudenheim

    Attention shoppers: low prices of shots in the clinic off aisle 7

    The New York Times

    (14 May 2006)
  • M. Freudenheim

    Luring patients from medicare

    The New York Times

    (22 September 2006)
  • W.H. Frist

    Shattuck lecture: health care in the 21st century

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (2005)
  • R.A. Garibaldi et al.

    Career plans for trainees in internal medicine residency programs

    Academic Medicine

    (2005)
  • S.W. Glickman et al.

    Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • M. Gold

    Private plans in medicare: a 2007 update

    Medicare Issue brief

    (March 2007)
  • Cited by (78)

    • “We were on our own”: Mothers’ experiences navigating the fragmented system of professional care for autism

      2018, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Changes in healthcare in the past several decades have led to a system that is less centralized and more fragmented than in the past. Professional “jurisdictions,” the areas of work over which professions compete (Abbott, 1988), have shrunk in medicine due to specialization (McKinlay and Marceau, 2008; Weisz, 2005). Further, the rise and expansion of paraprofessions, which include physical, occupational, and speech therapists, chiropractors, and other non-physician clinicians, have further fragmented medicine's jurisdiction (Hoff et al., 2017; McKinlay and Marceau, 2002).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text