Abstract
Although primary prevention studies are important tools in helping the healthy elderly stay healthy, recruiting from a community-based cohort of healthy elderly individuals for a primary prevention study involves numerous barriers. To better identify and understand these barriers, we conducted and evaluated a comprehensive recruitment strategy for a primary prevention study testing aspirin in an HMO population. In the recruitment phase, we identified healthy individuals (65 years of age or older) who were members of a large, group-model HMO in Oregon and Washington, and used computerized medical database screening, statistical sampling, health plan mailings, e-mail communication with primary care providers, and the experience of a well-established research clinic in an effort to enroll health elderly in this primary prevention trial. Among a random sample of 47,453 eligible patients over the age of 65, 44% responded to recruitment efforts, but only 3% were enrolled—an overall yield of slightly less than 2%. To evaluate these results, we then conducted focus groups with 225 randomly selected “eligible refusers.” We determined that healthy elders were hesitant to give up their choice to use aspirin, unwilling to travel to the research center, and reluctant to risk their tenuous hold on good health to participate in a study of primary prevention. Awareness of these attitudes is an indispensable step toward designing effective recruitment strategies for primary prevention studies involving the healthy elderly.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Cameron HJ, Williams BO. Clinical trials in the elderly. Should we do more? Drugs Aging 1996; 9:307-310.
Lovato LC, Hill K, Hertert S, Hunninghake DB, Probstfield JL. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: Literature summary and annotated bibliography. Controlled Clin Trials 1997; 18:328-357.
Vogt TM, Ireland CC, Black D, Camel G, Hughes G. Recruitment of elderly volunteers for a multicenter clinical trial: The SHEP pilot study. Controlled Clin Trials 1986; 7:118-133.
Silagy CA, Campion K, McNeil JJ et al. Comparison of recruitment strategies for a large-scale clinical trial in the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44:1105-1114.
Adams J, Silverman M, Musa D, Peele P. Recruiting older adults for clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1997; 18:14-26.
Talley NJ, Evans JM, Fleming KC, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and dyspepsia in the elderly. Digestive Dis Sciences 1995; 40:1345-1350.
Psaty BM, Lee M, Savage PJ, Rutan GH, German PS, Lyles M. Assessing the use of medications in the elderly: Methods and initial experience in the CHS. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:683-692.
Leader MA, Neuwirth E. Clinical research and the noninstitutional elderly: A model for subject recruitment. J Am Geriatrics Soc 1978; 26:27-31.
Valanis B, Blank J, Glass A. Mailing strategies and costs of recruiting heavy smokers in CARET, a large chemoprevention trial. Controlled Clin Trials 1998; 19:25-38.
Schron EN, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Pressel S. Clinical trial participant satisfaction: Survey of SHEP enrollees. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45:934-938.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boles, M., Getchell, W.S., Feldman, G. et al. Primary Prevention Studies and the Healthy Elderly: Evaluating Barriers to Recruitment. Journal of Community Health 25, 279–292 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005153909429
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005153909429