Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis, and the correlation of clinical Amsel criteria with Gram Nugent criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a low risk population of pregnant women. Pregnant women under 28 weeks of gestation who were followed in the low risk clinics at two centers were evaluated for the presence of bacterial vaginosis using the Amsel clinical criteria, and underwent vaginal samples for Gram staining. Gram smears were examined for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis on the basis of Nugent's criteria. A total of 492 women were included in the study. Bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 1.6% (8/492) women on the basis of clinical criteria, and in 4.5% (22/492) according to Gram stain. The sensitivity and specificity of Amsel criteria compared with Gram stain were 35% and 99%, respectively. In accordance with other recent reports, the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis appears to be much lower in certain areas than figures previously suggested. In these populations, the correlation of composite clinical criteria defined in groups with high prevalence of bacterial vaginosis appears to be also poor.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hillier SL, Kronh MA, Nugent RP, Gibbs RS. Characteristics of three vaginal flora patterns assessed by Gram stain among pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 938–944.
Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KCS, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. Nonspecific vaginitis: Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74: 14–22.
Mead MD. Epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 446–449.
Kurki T, Sivonen A, Renkonen O-V, Savia E, Ylikokala O. Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 173–177.
Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, et al. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1737–1742.
Thomason JL, Gelbert Sm, Anderson RJ, Walt AK, Osypowski PJ, Broekhuizen FF. Statistical evaluation of diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 155–160.
Easmon CSF, Hay PE, Ison CA. Bacterial vaginosis: A diagnostic approach. Genitourin Med 1992; 68: 134–138.
Spiegel CA, Amsel R, Holmes KK. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct Gram stain of vaginal fluid. J Clin Microbio 1983; 18: 170–177.
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 297–301.
McDonald HM, O'Loughlin JA, Vigneswaran R, Jolley PT, Harvey JA, Bof A, McDonald PJ. Impact of metronidazole therapy on preterm birth in women with bacterial vaginosis flora (Gardnerella vaginalis), placebo controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 104: 1391–1397.
Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. Comparison of methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 1266–1271.
Schwebke JR, Hillier SL, Sobel JD, McGregor JA, Sweet RL. Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 573–576.
Eschenbach DA, Hillier S, Critchlow C, Stevens C, DeRouen T, Holmes KK. Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 819–828.
Cristiano L, Rampello S, Noris C, Valota V. Bacterial vaginosis: Prevalence in an Italian population of asymptomatic pregnant women. Eur J Epidemiol 1996; 12: 386–390.
Mardh PA. The vaginal ecosystem. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1163–1168.
Gratacos E, Figueras F, Barranco M, Vila J, Cararach V, Alonso PL, Fortuny A. Spontaneous recovery of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy is not associated with an improved perinatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 37–40.
Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor Robinson D, Morgan J, Ison C, Pearson J. Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and miscarriage. Br Med J 1994; 308: 295–298.
Martinez de Tejada B, Coll O, de Flores M, Hillier SL, Landers DV. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in an obstetric population of Barcelona. Med Clin (Barc) 1998; 110: 201–204.
Nicand E, Cavallo JD, Crenn Y, Meyran M. Value of the score for Gram strains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Pathol Biol 1994; 42: 539–543.
Goldenberg RL, Klebanoff MA, Nugent R, Krohn MA, Hillier S, Andrews WW. Bacterial colonization of the vagina during pregnancy in four ethnic groups. Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1618–1621.
Llahi-Camp JM, Rai R, Ison C, Regan L, Taylor-Robinson D. Association of bacterial vaginosis with a history of second trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1575–1578.
Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Mercer BM, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, Copper RL, et al. The preterm prediction study: The value of new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous preterm births. NICHD MFMU Network. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 233–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gratacós, E., Figueras, F., Barranco, M. et al. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and correlation of clinical to Gram stain diagnostic criteria in low risk pregnant women. Eur J Epidemiol 15, 913–916 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007673531595
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007673531595