Abstract
Eighty-nine and a half per cent of the population of a general practice over the age of 49 years were screened for glaucoma and high risk ocular hypertension requiring treatment. Screening took place using semi-automated intraocular pressure and visual field equipment operated by non-ophthalmologically trained staff. An experienced ophthalmologist examined all patients in a single blind manner to reduce false negatives to a minimum. Patients suspected of requiring treatment on the grounds of raised intraocular pressure, abnormal visual fields or suspicious optic discs were subsequently examined in a hospital clinic. Treatment criteria, as commonly practiced, were carefully defined and the sensitivities and specificities of the methods of screening used were calculated. One and three tenths per cent of the practice population were known to be receiving treatment prior to the study and a further 1.4% were found to require treatment after screening.
The sensitivity and specificity of the non-contact tonometer were 91.7% and 95.6% respectively with a predictive power of 22.5% for a positive result. The mean time taken to perform the test in both eyes was two minutes.
Seventy per cent of the patients with pressures over 22 mmHg in both eyes on screening were found to require treatment. The routine use of the field screener did not increase either the sensitivity or specificity of the screening process but its use in cases with raised intraocular pressure is advised to indicate the degree of urgency of the referral.
An algorithm based on the results of the study is suggested when planning the use of semi-automated equipment to screen for ocular disease related to raised intraocular pressure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Hollows FC and Graham PA : Intraocular pressure, glaucoma and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Opthalmol 1966, 50: 570–86.
Bengtsonn B : The prevalence of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1981, 65: 46–9.
Gibson JM, Rosenthal AR, Lavery J : A study on the prevalence of eye disease in the elderly in an English Community. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1985,104: 196–203.
Ghafour IM, Allan D, Foulds WS : Common causes of blindness and visual handicap in the West of Scotland. Br J Ophthalmol 1983, 67: 209–13.
Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR : Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III Quantitative correlation of nerve fibre loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischaemic neuropathy, papilledema and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1982, 100: 135–46.
Harrison RJ, Wild JM, Hobley AJ : Referral patterns to an ophthalmic outpatient clinic by general practitioners and ophthalmic opticians and the role of these professionals in screening for ocular disease. Br Med J 1988, 297: 1162–7.
Pitts Crick R : Chronic glaucoma—A preventable cause of blindness. Lancet 1974, 1: 205–7.
Steinmann WC : The ‘who’ and ‘how’ of detecting glaucoma. Br Med J 1982, 285: 1091–3.
MacKean JM and Elkington AR : Referral rates to hospital of patients with chronic open angle glaucoma. Br Med J 1982, 285: 1093–5.
Brittain GPH, Austin DJ, Kelly SP : A prospective survey to determine sources and diagnostic accuracy of glaucoma referrals. Health Trends 1988, 20: 43–4.
Vernon SA and Henry DJ : Do optometrists screen for glaucoma? Eye (in pressin press).
Leske MC and Hawkins BS : Screening: relationship to diagnosis and therapy. In: Clinical Ophthalmology (Duanne TD, Jaeger EA, ed.) Philadelphia, Harper and Row. 1987, 3(54): 1–16.
Trobe JD, Acosta PC, Shuster JJ, Krischer JP : An evaluation of the accuracy of community based perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1980, 90: 654–60.
Rock WT, Drance SD, Morgan RW : Visual field screening in glaucoma—an evaluation of the Armaly technique for screening glaucomatous visual fields. Arch Ophthalmol 1973, 89: 287–90.
Hitchings RA : Screening for glaucoma. Br Med J 1986, 292: 505–6.
Klein BEK, Moss SE, Magli YL, et al. Optic disc cupping as clinically estimated from photographs. Ophthalmology 1987, 94: 1481–3.
Grolman B : A new tonometer system. Am J Optom and Arch Am Acad Optom 1972, 49: 646–60.
Fisher JH, Watson PG, Spaeth G : A new handheld air impulse tonometer. Eye 1988, 2: 238–42.
Vernon SA : Non-contact tonometry in the postoperative eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1989, 73: 247–9.
Hotchkiss ML, Robin AL, Quigley HA, Pollack IP : A comparison of peritest automated perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1985, 103: 397–403.
Batko KA, Anctil JL, Anderson DR : Detecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyser compared with the Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disc. Am J Ophthalmol 1983, 95: 435–47.
Henson CFS2000 Central Field Screener—operating instructions 1988. Keeler Ltd., Windsor Berks.
Ross JC, Bron AJ, Reeves BC, Emmerson PG : Detection of optic nerve damage in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 1985, 69: 897–903.
Pederson JE and Anderson DR : The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1980, 98: 490–5.
Airaksinsen PJ, Drance SM, Douglas GR, Schulzer M, Wijsman K : Visual field and retinal nerve fibre layer comparisons in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1985, 103: 205–7.
Balazsi AG, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Douglas GR : Neuroretinal rim area in suspected glaucoma and early chronic open angle glaucoma. Correlation with parameters of visual function. Arch Ophthalmol 1984, 102: 1011–14.
Weinstein GW, Arden GB, Hitchings RA, Ryan S, Caithorpe CM, Odom JV : The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1988,106: 923–8.
Gunduz K, Arden GB, Peery S, Weinstein GW, Hitchings RA : Colour vision defects in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1988, 106: 929–35.
Wanger P and Persson HE : Pattern electroretinograms and high pass resolution perimetry in suspected or early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1988, 95: 1098–103.
Nanba K and Schwartz B : Nerve fibre layer and optic disc fluorescein defects in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology 1988, 95: 1227–33.
Kass MA, Kolker AE, Becker B : Prognostic factors in glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1976, 94: 1274–6.
Armaly MF, Kreuger DE, Maunder L, Becker B : Biostatistical analysis of the Collaborative Glaucoma Study. (1) Summary report of the risk factors for glaucomatous visual field defects. Arch Ophthalmol 1980, 98: 2163–71.
Lewis JM, Priddy T, Judd J, et al: Intraocular pressure response to topical dexamethasone as a predictor for the development of primary open angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1988, 106: 607–12.
Smith RJH : Ocular hypertension. Res Clin Forum 1980, 2: 129–31.
Mills KB : Ocular hypertension. Res Clin Forum 1985, 7: 81–4.
Goldmann H : An analysis of some concepts concerning chronic simple glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1975, 80: 409–13.
Drance SM : When to advise medical treatment for open angle glaucoma. Eye 1987, 1: 43–4.
Grant WM and Burke JF : Why do some people go blind from glaucoma? Ophthalmology 1982, 89: 991–8.
Jay JL and Murray SB : Early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1988, 72: 881–9.
Hitchings RA : Low tension glaucoma—is treatment worthwhile? Eye 1988, 2: 636–40.
Smith J : Diurnal intraocular pressure—correlation with automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 1985, 92: 858–61.
David R, Zangwill L, Stone D, Yassur Y : Epidemiology of intraocular pressure in a population screened for glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1987,71: 766–71.
Graham P and Hollows FC : Sources of variation in tonometry. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1964, 84: 597–613.
Piltz JR, Starita R, Miron M, Henkind P : Momentary fluctuations in intraocular pressure in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1985, 99: 333–9.
Brubaker RF : Tonometry—In: Clinical Ophthalmology. (Duane TD, Jaeger EA, ed.Duane TD, Jaeger EA, ed.)Philadelphia, Harper and Row 1987, 3(47): 1–7.
Wilke K : Effects of repeated tonometry: genuine and sham measurements. Acta Ophthalmol 1972, 50: 574–82.
Aclimandos WR and Galloway NR : Blindness in the city of Nottingham (1980-85). Eye 1988,2: 431–4.
Green JS, Bear JC, Johnson GJ : The burden of genetically determined eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 1986, 70: 696–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vernon, S., Henry, D., Cater, L. et al. Screening for glaucoma in the community by non-ophthalmologically trained staff using semi automated equipment. Eye 4, 89–97 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1990.10
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1990.10
This article is cited by
-
Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Iceland: Reykjavik Eye Study
Eye (2003)
-
Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice?
Eye (2001)
-
Letter
Eye (1999)
-
Glaucoma screening by optometrists: Positive predictive value of visual field testing
Eye (1998)
-
Design of low cost glaucoma screening
Documenta Ophthalmologica (1997)