Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examines how specific attributes of managed health plans influence patients’ relationships with their primary care practitioners (PCPs) and determines whether these effects are mediated by access to, continuity with, or perceived choice of PCPs.
DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: The data source was the nationally representative 1996/97 Community Tracking Study Household Survey (cumulative response rate 65%). The study population (N=19,415) was composed of 18- to 64-year-old adults whose most recent visit in the past 12 months was made to their primary care delivery site.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients’ ratings of their interpersonal relationships with their PCPs as measured by a 7-item scale.
RESULTS: Gatekeeping arrangements that require patients to select a primary care physician or obtain authorization for specialty referrals were associated with lower ratings of the patient-PCP relationship. Health plan use of a provider network had no effect on the patient-PCP scale score. Although there were no significant differences across any insurance payer categories, uninsured adults rated their relationships with PCPs as significantly poorer than did their insured counterparts. Shorter office waits, having a specific clinician at the primary care site, better perceived choice of PCPs, and a longer duration of relationship with the primary care practitioner were associated with higher ratings of the patient-PCP relationship. Perceived choice of primary care practitioners, but not access to or continuity with PCPs, attenuated some of the negative effects of gatekeeping arrangements on patients’ relationships with their primary care practitioners.
CONCLUSIONS: Managed health plans that loosen restrictions on provider choice, relax gatekeeping arrangements, or promote access to and continuity with PCPs, are likely to experience higher patient satisfaction with their primary care practitioner relationships. Lack of health insurance impedes the development of patients’ relationships with their primary care practitioners.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow N, eds. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 1996.
Leopold N, Cooper J, Clancy C. Sustained partnership in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1996;42:129–37.
Hjortdahl P, Laerum E. Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ. 1992;304:1287–90.
Emanuel EJ, Brett AS. Managed competition and the patient-physician relationship. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:879–82.
Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, et al. Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA. 1999;282:261–6.
Lake T. Do HMOs make a difference? Consumer assessments of health care. Inquiry. 1999;36:411–8.
Miller RH, Luft HS. Managed care plans: characteristics, growth and premium performance. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:437–59.
Davis K, Collins KS, Schoen C, Morris C. Choice matters: enrollees’ views of their health plans. Health Aff (Millwood). 1995;14:100–12.
Flocke SA, Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ. The impact of insurance type and forced discontinuity on the delivery of primary care. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:129–35.
Mechanic D, Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients’ trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA. 1996;275:1693–7.
Kao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA. 1998;280:1708–14.
Schmittdiel J, Selby JV, Grumbach K, Quesenberry CP Jr. Choice of a personal physician and patient satisfaction in a health maintenance organization. JAMA. 1997;278:1596–9.
Forrest CB, Starfield B. Entry into primary care and continuity: the effects of access. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1330–6.
Safran DG, Tarlov AR, Rogers WH. Primary care performance in fee-for-service and prepaid health care systems: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1994;271:1579–86.
Mark T, Mueller C. Access to care in HMOs and traditional insurance plans. Health Aff. 1996;15:81–7.
Kerr EA, Hays RD, Lee ML, Siu AL. Does dissatisfaction with access to specialists affect the desire to leave a managed care plan? Med Care Res Rev. 1998;55:138–51.
Emanuel EJ, Dubler NN. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1995;273:323–9.
Thom DH, Campbell B. Patient-physician trust: an exploratory study. J Fam Pract. 1997;44:169–76.
O’Malley AS, Forrest CB, O’Malley PG. Low-income women’s priorities for primary care: a qualitative study. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:141–6.
Kemper P, Blumenthal D, Corrigan JM, et al. The design of the Community Tracking Study: a longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people. Inquiry. 1996;33:195–206.
Metcalf CE, Kemper P, Kohn LT, Pickereign JD. Site Definition and Sample Design for the Community Tracking Study (Technical Publication I). Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1996.
Reschovsky JD. Do HMOs make a difference? Data and methods. Inquiry. 1999;36:378–89.
Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
Lambrew JM, DeFrisse GH, Carey TS, Ricketts TC, Biddle AK. The effects of having a regular doctor on access to primary care. Med Care. 1996;34:138–51.
Mainous AG, Gill JM. The importance of continuity of care in the likelihood of future hospitalization: is site of care equivalent to a primary care clinician? Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1539–41.
Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS. SUDAAN User’s Manual Release 7.5. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1997.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. 2nd Ed. Boston, Mass: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.
Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1989.
Safran DG, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR, et al. Organizational and financial characteristics of health plans: are they related to primary care performance? Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:69–76.
Nelson DE, Thompson BL, Davenport NJ, Penaloza LJ. What people really know about their health insurance: a comparison of information obtained from individuals and their insurers. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:924–8.
Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine: a professional evolution. JAMA. 1996;275:152–6.
Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:763–9.
Smith RC, Lyles JS, Mettler J, et al. The effectiveness of intensive training for residents in interviewing. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:118–26.
Smith RC, Marshall-Dorsey AA, Osborn GG, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for teaching patient-centered interviewing. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:27–36.
Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:657–75.
Kasteler J, Kane RL, Olsen DM, Thetford C. Issues underlying prevalence of “doctor-shopping” behavior. J Health Soc Behav. 1976;17:328–39.
Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Impact of the doctor-patient relationship on the outcomes of chronic disease. In: Stewart M, Roter D, eds. Communicating with Medical Patients. London: Sage Publications; 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Received from the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
This research was supported by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant no. 036484.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forrest, C.B., Shi, L., Schrader, S.v. et al. Managed care, primary care, and the patient-practitioner relationship. J GEN INTERN MED 17, 270–277 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10309.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10309.x