Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Online learning has changed medical education, but many “educational” websites do not employ principles of effective learning. This article will assist readers in developing effective educational websites by integrating principles of active learning with the unique features of the Web.

DESIGN: Narrative review.

RESULTS: The key steps in developing an effective educational website are: Perform a needs analysis and specify goals and objectives; determine technical resources and needs; evaluate preexisting software and use it if it fully meets your needs; secure commitment from all participants and identify and address potential barriers to implementation; develop content in close coordination with website design (appropriately use multimedia, hyperlinks, and online communication) and follow a timeline; encourage active learning (self-assessment, reflection, self-directed learning, problem-based learning, learner interaction, and feedback); facilitate and plan to encourage use by the learner (make website accessible and user-friendly, provide time for learning, and motivate learners); evaluate learners and course; pilot the website before full implementation; and plan to monitor online communication and maintain the site by resolving technical problems, periodically verifying hyperlinks, and regularly updating content.

CONCLUSION: Teaching on the Web involves more than putting together a colorful webpage. By consistently employing principles of effective learning, educators will unlock the full potential of Web-based medical education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKimm J, Jollie C, Cantillon P. ABC of learning and teaching: Web based learning. BMJ. 2003;326:870–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S86-S93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallgren RC, Parkhurst PE, Monson CL, Crewe NM. An interactive, Web-based tool for learning anatomic landmarks. Acad Med. 2002;77:263–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kemper KJ, Amata-Kynvi A, Sanghavi D, et al. Randomized trial of an Internet curriculum on herbs and other dietary supplements for health care professionals. Acad Med. 2002;77:882–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spickard A III, Alrajeh N, Cordray D, Gigante J. Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter? J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:540–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamin C, O’Sullivan P, Deterding R, Younger M. A comparison of critical thinking in groups of third-year medical students in text, video, and virtual PBL case modalities. Acad Med. 2003;78:204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman RB. Top ten reasons the World Wide Web may fail to change medical education. Acad Med. 1996;71:979–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alur P, Fatima K, Joseph R. Medical teaching websites: do they reflect the learning paradigm? Med Teach. 2002;24:422–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Minasian-Batmanian LC. Guidelines for developing an online learning strategy for your subject. Med Teach. 2002;24:645–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horton S. Web Teaching Guide: A Practical Approach to Creating Course Web Sites. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cato J. User-centered Web Design. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-step Approach. Baltimore, Md: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu E, Payette P, DeZure D. An Introduction to Teaching Online. CRLT Occasional Papers. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koller CA, Frankenfield JJ, Sarley CA. Twelve tips for developing educational multimedia in a community-based teaching hospital. Med Teach. 2000;22:7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis MH, Harden RM. E is for everything—e-learning? Med Teach. 2001;23:441–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Toohey S, Watson E. Twelve tips on choosing web teaching software. Med Teach. 2001;23:552–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ. 2001;322:40–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bell DS, Fonarow GC, Hays RD, Mangione CM. Self-study from web-based and printed guideline materials: a randomized, controlled trial among resident physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:938–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grundman J, Wigton R, Nickol D. A controlled trial of an interactive, Web-based virtual reality program for teaching physical diagnosis skills to medical students. Acad Med. 2000;75(10 suppl):S47-S49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludlow JB, Platin E. A comparison of Web page and slide/tape for instruction in periapical and panoramic radiographic anatomy. J Dent Educ. 2000;64:269–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Santer D, Michaelsen V, Erkonen W, et al. A comparison of educational interventions. Multimedia textbook, standard lecture, and printed textbook. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:297–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brooks DW. Web-teaching: A Guide to Designing Interactive Teaching for the World Wide Web. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenberg MJ. E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sekikawa A, Aaron DJ, Acosta B, Sa E, LaPorte RE. Does the perception of downloading speed influence the evaluation of web-based lectures? Public Health. 2001;115:152–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuh JL, Abbott AV, Ontai S. Pilot study of a rating instrument for medical education Web sites. Acad Med. 2000;75:290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffman GM. Copyright in Cyberspace: Questions and Answers for Librarians. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Collison G, Elbaum B, Haavind S, Tinker R. Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators. Madison, Wis: Atwood Publishing; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ellenchild Pinch W, Graves J. Using web-based discussion as a teaching strategy: bioethics as an exemplar. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:704–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lipman AJ, Sade RM, Glotzbach AL, Lancaster CJ, Marshall MF. The incremental value of Internet-based instruction as an adjunct to classroom instruction: a prospective randomized study. Acad Med. 2001;76:1060–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Steinert Y, McLeod P, Conochie L, Nasmith L. An online discussion for medical faculty: an experiment that failed. Acad Med. 2002;77:939–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jha V, Duffy S. Ten golden rules for designing software in medical education: results from a formative evaluation of DIALOG. Med Teach. 2002;24:417–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Krug S. Don’t Make Me Think! A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Indianapolis, Ind: Macmillan USA; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The National Cancer Institute. Usability.gov: improving the communication of cancer research; Available at: http://usability.gov. Accessed June 4, 2003.

  34. Meyers C, Jones TB. Promoting active learning: strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kaufman DM. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 2003;326:213–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Papa FJ, Aldrich D, Schumacker RE. The effects of immediate online feedback upon diagnostic performance. Acad Med. 1999;74(10 suppl):S16-S18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jarvis P, Holford J, Griffin C. The Theory and Practice of Learning. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Leong SL, Baldwin CD, Adelman AM. Integrating Web-based computer cases into a required clerkship: development and evaluation. Acad Med. 2003;78:295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dornan T, Lee C, Stopford A. Skills base: a Web-based electronic learning portfolio for clinical skills. Acad Med. 2001;76:542–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Carr M, Hewitt J, Scardamalia M, Reznick R. Internet-based otolaryngology case discussions for medical students. J Otolaryngol. 2002;31:197–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McGrath D, Maulitz R, Baldwin CD. An active learning framework that delivers clinical education case studies on the web. Acad Med. 2001;76:548.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Chueh H, Barnett G. “Just-in-time” clinical information. Acad Med. 1997;72:512–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Baumlin KM, Bessette MJ, Lewis C, Richardson LD. EMCyber-School: an evaluation of computer-assisted instruction on the Internet. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:959–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cahill D, Cook J, Sithers A, Edwards J, Jenkins J. Evaluation of an online postgraduate education programme. Med Teach. 2002;24:425–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wood DF. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: problem based learning. BMJ. 2003;326:328–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wlodkowsi RJ. Strategies to enhance adult motivation to learn. In: Galbraith MW, ed. Adult Learning Methods: A Guide to Effective Instruction. 2nd ed. Malabar, Fla: Krieger Publishing Company; 1998;91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Beasley BW, Kallail KJ, Walling AD, Davis N, Hudson L. Maximizing the use of a Web-based teaching skills curriculum for community-based volunteer faculty. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2001;21:158–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Miller AP, Haden P, Schwartz PL, Loten EG. Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: II. Computer-based, individual. Acad Med. 1997;72:1113–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Morrison J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: evaluation. BMJ. 2003;326:385–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cook DA, Dupras DM. Flexible teaching for inflexible schedules: an online resident curriculum in acute ambulatory care. Med Teach. 2003;25:330–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zucker S, White JA, Fabri PJ, Khonsari LS. Instructional intranets in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 1998;73:1072–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Harden R. Myths and e-learning. Med Teach. 2002;24:469–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Knowles MS, Holton EF III, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner. 5th ed. Woburn, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Cook MD.

Additional information

A presentation illustrating the step-by-step application of this process is available online at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/products/journals/suppmat/jgi/JG130029_appendix.ppt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, D.A., Dupras, D.M. A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 698–707 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30029.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30029.x

Key words

Navigation