Chest
Volume 111, Issue 4, April 1997, Pages 877-884
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations: Lung Cancer
Detecting Lung Cancer as a Cause of Hemoptysis in Patients with a Normal Chest Radiograph: Bronchoscopy vs CT

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.111.4.877Get rights and content

Objective

To determine whether fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) or CT results in the lowest number of tests needed to diagnose (NTND) lung cancers in patients presenting with hemoptysis and a normal chest radiograph (CXR).

Design

Calculation of the NTND in a hypothetical cohort of patients presenting with hemoptysis and a normal CXR.

Interventions

In the primary analysis, either FOB or CT is performed to detect lung cancers. FOB is used to diagnose endobronchial abnormalities, and transthoracic needle aspirate is relied on to diagnose parenchymal findings. Patients then undergo serial follow-up CXRs. In a secondary analysis, sputum cytologic tests are performed prior to FOB and CT. Abnormal cytologic results require FOB. Unremarkable cytologic results allow a choice between FOB or CT.

Measurements

NTND and number of lung cancers detected during serial follow-up CXRs.

Results

Performing FOB results in a much lower NTND than CT with a similar number of lung cancers detected during serial follow-up with each approach. Reducing the false-positive rate for lung cancers of airway evaluations by CT reduces the NTND for the CT strategy. Performing both FOB and CT results in a large NTND. Adding sputum cytology as a guide for performing FOB substantially reduces the NTND for the FOB approach.

Conclusion

A strategy relying on initial sputum cytologic testing as a screen for choosing either FOB as an immediate diagnostic step or serial follow-up CXR to detect lung cancer in patients presenting with hemoptysis and a normal CXR results in the lowest NTND with only a marginal reduction in the early detection of all cancers.

Section snippets

Baseline Model

In patients presenting with hemoptysis and a normal CXR, there would be an initial choice between performing FOB or CT. A positive CT result requires a follow-up test to obtain histologic/cytologic confirmation of malignancy. Central airway abnormalities seen on CT would be assessed by FOB and parenchymal abnormalities suspicious for a lung cancer by TTNA. Because both FOB and CT may not detect all lung cancers, serial follow-up CXRs follow each negative result. During this follow-up period,

Baseline Model and Estimates

Using the baseline model and assumptions, with both the FOB and CT approaches, five cancers are discovered during the initial evaluation and one cancer is found through serial follow-up (Fig 1). Because both approaches result in approximately the same number of serial follow-up CXR examinations for all analyses, the NTND has been calculated as the number of FOB, CT, and TTNA studies performed with each option. The CT approach results in a NTND of 133, higher than the NTND of 101 for FOB, due to

Discussion

Objective guidelines are becoming increasingly important to clinicians in their choice of diagnostic strategies for solving clinical problems. The NTND is relatively simple to calculate and provides readily understandable information to the clinician about the impact of a first diagnostic test on the workload needed to solve a clinical problem. In the clinical scenario of a patient presenting with hemoptysis and a normal CXR, the dilemma revolves around identifying the few patients with lung

References (43)

  • ColiceGL. et al.

    for known or suspected lung cancer

    Chest

    (1994)
  • MinamiH et al.

    Interbronchoscopist variability in the diagnosis of lung cancer by flexible bronchoscopy

    Chest

    (1994)
  • EdellES et al.

    Photodynamic therapy in the management of early superficial squamous cell carcinoma as an alternative to surgical resection

    Chest

    (1992)
  • TockmanM et al.

    The early detection of second primary lung cancers by sputum immunostaining

    Chest

    (1994)
  • HaponikEF et al.

    Hemoptysis: clinicians' perspective

    Chest

    (1990)
  • SomnerAR et al.

    Value of bronchoscopy in clinical practice

    BMJ

    (1958)
  • SolomonDA et al.

    Cytology in fiberoptic bronchoscopy

    Chest

    (1974)
  • GongH et al.

    Clinical efficacy of early and delayed fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients with hemoptysis

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1981)
  • KallenbachJ et al.

    Haemoptysis with no radiological evidence of tumour—the value of early bronchoscopy

    S Afr Med J

    (1981)
  • AckartRS et al.

    Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in outpatient facilities, 1982

    Arch Intern Med

    (1983)
  • PetersJ et al.

    Evaluation of hemoptysis in patients with a normal chest roentgenogram

    West J Med

    (1984)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemoptysis

      2016, Archivos de Bronconeumologia
    • Clinical Aspects of Lung Cancer

      2015, Murray and Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine: Volume 1,2, Sixth Edition
    • Clinical and organizational factors in the initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

      2013, Chest
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients may dismiss small amounts of blood streaking in sputum as related to bronchitis and cough. However, hemoptysis may be the presenting symptom of lung cancer even in the setting of a normal or nonlocalizing chest radiograph.12 Persistent hemoptysis, even in scant amounts, in patients with a history of smoking and COPD should raise concern about the possibility of endobronchial tumor.

    • Diagnosing Cancer in the Symptomatic Patient

      2009, Primary Care - Clinics in Office Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, for a patient with risk factors for and symptoms suggestive of bronchogenic cancer, such as a smoker older than the age of 40 with a history of COPD who presents with cough and hemoptysis, there should still be a high index of suspicion for lung cancer despite a normal chest radiograph. While a CT scan may be considered for further diagnostic evaluation, even CT scanning may fail to detect endobronchial cancers.53,54 Therefore, bronchoscopy is indicated when there is a high index of suspicion for lung cancer even when the chest radiograph is normal.42,45

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text