Concurrent validation of the 21-item and 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale versus the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria to assess depression in patients with Parkinson's disease: an exploratory analysis

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2008;14(3):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2007.08.013. Epub 2007 Oct 31.

Abstract

Objective: The concurrent validity of this 6-item version of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-6) compared to the original 21-item tool (HDRS-21), using the DSM-IV criteria for major depression as the gold standard in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Methods: In analytical study were analyzed: Cronbach's alpha (alpha C), item-total correlation, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and their area under the curve (AUC), Finally, used the Fagan nomogram.

Results: The 115-patient sample with mean illness duration of 7.15 years. HDRS-21 achieved an alpha C of 0.83, HDRS-6 a value of 0.68. Eleven of the HDRS-21 items failed to reach a minimum value. HDRS-21 obtained its better AUC capacity of 0.94 (cut/score of 18/19); HDRS-6 got an AUC of 0.92 (cut/score of 7/8). The Fagan nomogram was (89-94% and 83-90%, respectively).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that HDRS-6 is sufficient, valid and has a sound psychometric structure for use with Parkinson's disease patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Depression / diagnosis*
  • Depression / etiology*
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Parkinson Disease / complications*
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Severity of Illness Index