Determinants of self-rated health items with different points of reference: implications for health measurement of older adults

J Aging Health. 2008 Sep;20(6):739-61. doi: 10.1177/0898264308321035. Epub 2008 Jul 14.

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed whether three commonly used self-rated health (SRH) items (global, age-comparative, and self-comparative) are equivalent measures of health perception for older adults.

Method: Regression analyses were used to simultaneously contrast the associations between physical, psychological, and social factors relating to health for three SRH items, in a large ( N = 2,034) population-based sample of older adults (65 years and older) from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Results: Health perceptions were more positive for the age-comparative SRH measure, compared to the pessimistic ratings of the self-comparative measure, particularly for the oldest-old adults. Different patterns of associations between the health factors and SRH measures were found.

Discussion: These results show the three SRH items are not equivalent measures of health and cannot be used interchangeably. The reference point of the SRH item has a considerable influence on health perceptions of older adults as it encapsulates unique health information.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged* / statistics & numerical data
  • Aging* / physiology
  • Aging* / psychology
  • Australia
  • Female
  • Health Status Indicators*
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Mental Health
  • Regression Analysis
  • Self Concept*
  • Sex Factors
  • Social Support