Purpose: To identify ancillary tests for which there are criteria defining the earliest interval at which a repeat test might be indicated, to determine how often each test is repeated earlier than these intervals and, if repeated, provides useful information.
Subjects and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 6,007 adults discharged from a large teaching hospital during a 3-month period in 1991. We measured the proportion of commonly performed diagnostic tests that were redundant, and their associated charges.
Results: Of the 6,007 patients discharged, 5,289 (88%) had at least one of 12 target tests performed. Overall, 78,798 of the target tests were performed during the study period, of which 22,237 (28%) were repeated earlier than test-specific predefined intervals. This percentage varied substantially by test (range, 2% to 62%). To assess how many early repeats were justified, we performed chart reviews in a random sample stratified by test. For two tests, nearly all the initial results in the sample were abnormal, and all repeats were considered justified. Of early repeats following a normal initial result for the remaining 10 tests, chart review found no clinical indication for 92%, and a weighted mean of 40% appeared redundant. Overall, 8.6% of these 10 tests appeared redundant; if these were not performed, the annual charge reductions would be $930,000 at our hospital, although the impact on costs would be much smaller.
Conclusions: For some tests, an important proportion are repeated too early to provide useful clinical information. Most such tests might be eliminated using computerized reminder systems.